OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums

OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums (http://forums.ozmium.com.au/index.php)
-   Horse Race Betting Systems (http://forums.ozmium.com.au/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Blazing saddles 1,2,3 (http://forums.ozmium.com.au/showthread.php?t=4481)

27th March 2004 02:45 AM

Well. I'm still here. I've been testing my winning saddlecloth system over the last few melbourne race meetings, having a theoretical bank of $1000 for numbers 1,2 and 3. With a $3000 bank, so far I would have accumulated well over $2500, That's after about 110 races. That is betting to cover losses and make $50 on each winner 1,2 or 3.
Can anyone see anything inherently wrong with this system. I can't really

Cheers megamoos

ginger 27th March 2004 10:13 AM

hi megamoos the day has come
just a quick question with my quick calcs you have possibly outaid $3000 to $10000 is that right
cya

[ This Message was edited by: ginger on 2004-03-27 10:15 ]

Bhagwan 27th March 2004 11:37 AM

What you might like to do is do the maths on how much you are hehind if tou strike 8 outs in a row ,I feel you might find it frightening & 8 outs in a row, for this idea, do & will eventually occure so make sure you have a "what if plan" if this should occure.

Paddy 27th March 2004 11:40 AM

How does your "winning saddlecloth system" work again, megamoos?

Chrome Prince 28th March 2004 01:41 PM

megamoos,

Interested to know, are you target betting each TAB number to win $50 or dutch betting all three to win $50.
I'm thinking the former because you say you allocated a bank of $1000 to each.

You've got me thinking so I'm going to run some hypotheticals and get back to you.

Chrome Prince 28th March 2004 04:57 PM

No luck, couldn't get it below 6% LOT, maybe you have a secret :wink:

puntz 28th March 2004 05:32 PM



[ This Message was edited by: puntz on 2004-05-06 12:34 ]

costanza 29th March 2004 12:25 PM

This looks to have some promise but tracking it against Caulfield on the weekend could have been a bad day -

Race 1: Win on 1 (TAB odds at 2.10, 7.00, 10.50 for 1,2,3) * #2 placed
Race 2: Nothing (TAB 4.50, 31.80, 9.50) * #3 placed
Race 3: Nothing (TAB 5.90, 15.5, 7.6) * #1 placed
Race 4: Nothing (TAB 16.60, scr, 5.4) * #3 placed
Race 5: Nothing (TAB 31.70, 5.00, scr) *#2 placed
Race 6: Win on 1 (TAB 2.1, 7, 10.50)
Race 7: Nothing (TAB 5.20, scr, 12.50)
Race 8: Nothing (12.60,12,60, 21.10)

Even dutching on 1,2,3 and trying to recover would have made the average punter pretty nervous - and that's not even taking into account trying to actually do the maths prior to making a 'live' wager.

I'd be interested to hear peoples' views on how you might have tackled Caulfield on Saturday....

- Costanza

Chrome Prince 29th March 2004 03:47 PM



[ This Message was edited by: Chrome Prince on 2004-03-29 16:06 ]

costanza 29th March 2004 05:49 PM

Camperdown on the 28 March would have caused similar grief I think....

With wins in the 3rd and 4th race of the day, the remainder of the day was bleak.

If you were punting with a stop gap after 1-2 wins, then you'd have been fine I guess......

- Costanza


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:58 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.