Some interesting stats...
Estimated stats as of 2014 ...
There are 3m* regular bettors in Australia and their predominant method - system - style for placing bets is as follows: 1. logical = 600k (20%) 2. naive = 2m (69%) 3. superstitious = 330k (11%) * At least 21% of the adult population In other words: 80% use something other than logic to pick winners. I wonder how this split would play out on here. Any suggestions gentlemen? Cheers LG Source: provided on request |
hopefully a bit more on the logical section
in any case i disagree with those statistics. if 80% were either naive or superstitious - why is it so hard to win. IMHO i regard the average punter as quite astute in their judgement as reflected in the fact that there is only a slight loss on favourite backing. if there were 80% no idea then i expect that the winning ratio of favourites would be much lower. what do you reckon |
the majority of naive punters are probably sheep, so simply follow the market & back favoured runners helping to suck value out of final tote prices.
the superstitious figure sounds high to me, although I am guilty of it on occasion. |
Quote:
i agree - but 70% sounds a bit heavy. in any case where do they get this stuff from - no one asked me - so i wasn't included in the stats. probably walked into a pub tab near Frankston at 3.30PM on Melbourne cup day and did a survey and extrapolated it across the population. |
Quote:
With respect to the stats themselves, they are part of a thesis completed by the head man at NSW TAB during the 90s who passed on boxing day just gone (was completed after he retired). LG |
1 + 3 for me
|
All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:53 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.