
15th September 2007, 01:32 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,267
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by partypooper
You might think so but NO, not on an individual race, they differ incredibly, last week at belmont one "************" had a horse rated at 5-2, the other at 7-1, it won paying 10-1 (TOP FLUC), an unusual occurrance; but still it happens, it doesn't only happen between 2 experts, I've seen as many as 4 completely disagree with the top rater, even though over time all 4 are on a par, so which one is "VALUE" no-one seems to be able to come close to answering the question?
|
In that case (imho) 3-1 is good value to the one that rates a horse @2-1
|