Mmmmm pickles!

Woof has a nice system that has evolved from 1000's of hours of work going back many years. To simplify it matches race types against previous fav results and strongly factors observations less utilized such as 'turn times'. I suggest it also weighes heavily on determining 'false favs' as the races to bet up on with tri's/quinella's/exacta's, etc. He will continue to do nicely from it and he'll prosper from his effort.

I understand his study but prefer to keep rules to a minimum and keep the system much simpler than many of those posted here. A bit like Darky. It makes the data easier to interpret and adjustments become obvious.

To try to give an example of keeping things simple, does anyone share the belief the 6 box is automatically disadvantaged in a dog race for whatever reasons? There's a pure gut observation shared by most and it's surprisingly not hammered out yet by punters.