31st July 2012, 12:31 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 217
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by beton
Good read so far, Have to come back to it to finish. Hats of to "Phil" He is a far better man than me. One point comes over loud and clear:- The history ,the handicapping, the ratings are only part of the equation. They are the start of the exercise but the new knowledge :- the conditions of the track today and the condition of the individual horses today are the most important part of the equation.
"Phil" had men on the ground feeding him this info, Clearly we have to access more new knowledge. Beton
|
This has developed into something I never expected. When I said I had my system picks and then tried to use my own intelligence as a saver, I found a trend where my selections were generally more successful.
Maybe somewhere in between is where I should be looking. Using artificial intelligence ( the computer and combining that with natural intelligence ) the background and research.
Not trying to narrow it down to a single unit, but maybe as Beton has said, Getting rid of the chaff, might be a better policy.
Star
|