Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSchmile
|
Hi T.S.
Thanks for that i fully understand this have used,
That plus more.
What i want to know is this.
If Ratings as a process don't work in assessing horses,
Why then do race clubs employ handicappers throughout,
The world to use ratings when clearly we have been told,
They don't work.
I am not saying Don Scott unitab skyform etc backing all,
The top rated every race every day lose of course they will.
Name me 1 stat that only has 1 selection in every race that,
You can bet on every day in Australia that does.
What i want to know is the process we need to adopt,
That accurately weighs up what weight each horse should,
Be allocated (BUT NOT RATINGS AS THE PROCESS DOESN'T WORK)
I myself use ratings as a method of selection then play around a bit,
With the main chances apply some prices, filters, and away i go.
But as ratings don't work i need to know what process me and,
The club handicappers need to change to.
Remembering t.a.b. 1 wins more races than 2 morethan 3 etc.
Done by the clubs handicapper using ratings but how can this be right,
As ratings don't work?.
Cheers.