[QUOTE=moeee]If I was to go without a Winner for 20 races , I would simply inflammate myself ( that thing where you poor petrol over yourself then ignite it)

But what you say is true Star - just doesn't suit me.[/QUOTE]

I agree moeee.

But then, you would not be on the $44 winner at Warwick Farm which was my 18th loss in a row, but with $8 dollars bet it recovered my $39 loss from previous bets and it gave me a return of $352.80 leaving a profit for the series of $305.80.

I remember you saying in a previous reply to one of my threads that if I am not comfortable doing what has been suggested then that idea is probably not for me. Ain't that the truth.

I am only a small punter now, I bet just for an interest, so it is more important for me to have a small dabble, control the worst case senario and see if I can have some fun.

I used to have good success with the Treble years ago betting multiple horses. Today, the returns are just not there for me and I was burning money.

Pete