Thanks for posting that information becareful. It's pretty much as I suspected. Whilst I am open to new ideas and even staking plans, some things always remain unchanged. Logical mathematics will always prevail in the end and no matter how much someone argues that their system is different, if it doesn't win at level stakes, it won't win by staking.

Bert tried to tell me I was wrong, and that just doesn't make sense. There are much smarter mathematicians than myself with University Degrees who know this to be true.

"Not one losing day since September 2001."

I have been in this game long enough to spot illogical and improbable claims from afar.

As far as having cracked the trainers methods etc...I think this speaks for itself.

I'll stick to my system which shows a level stakes profit.

becareful, had you employed this system with a $1,000 bank, chasing a $5.00 profit - you would have lost your $1,000.00.

Risking $1000.00 to win $5.00 is simply illogical. There is no way you can win in the end. It's like backing an odds on favourite. You'd be better putting the $1,000 on a favourite showing $1.05 the win, that way you at least win $50.00.

[ This Message was edited by: Equine Investor on 2002-07-10 19:20 ]

[ This Message was edited by: Equine Investor on 2002-07-10 19:26 ]