9th April 2015, 07:35 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 755
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by evajb001
woof43 interesting you say that, when I was looking at how fav rankings compare between field sizes I found that the prices fit pretty closely to both exponential and logarithmic scales. If you plotted the rankings and prices over time for field sizes i'm guessing you'd be able to come up with an equation that estimates the prices closely to R&S P$, if you want to go to that effort i mean.
|
Been there, done that, but can't quite agree. Sure the charts differ, but I think it's more a duplication of this scenario: 6 blokes go to the club for a Sat punt. Natural selection (Fibonacci) will probably see 3 blokes back the fave, 2 the 2nd and 1 the 3rd. It's just nature and it produces a log curve. Look at my thread on the Golden Number 1.618. Using that ratio alone,is the almost the exact sequence for rank strike rates. |