Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dirk Gently
Getting back to the use of neurals, I've always put emphasis on the JT rating. How does it correlate to winners? I have generally ignored the timeform rating as it has a very high variance, particularly on weekdays but maybe I'm missing something. Cheers.
|
I am not a big fan of JT. JA is the best influence of JA, JT and TA.
TIM is as right as it is wrong.
Here are five neural settings to mess about with:
CP2, JA1, TA1, CRS2, DIS1, $2
CP3, CF1, JA3, TA1, DIS1
JA2, CRS2, $2
CP1, CF1, JA1, BP1, DIS1, $1
JA2, JT1, $1
The first mentioned setting is by far the most consistent I have ever come across. Plenty of winners in the top two or three, particularly in the bush.
The two settings which begin with JA, come up with some great winners from time to time.
However you use the neurals, there is still work to be done beyond coming up with a selection order.
For instance, take the top two from either setting (1) or (2). Of the top two selections, by taking the top mentioned runner from either of the JA settings,will improve the win strike rate.