View Single Post
  #10  
Old 27th July 2006, 07:52 PM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by woof43
Hi,
The following method is relatively crude, compared to what is possible. (... think of how you can use this technique not only to correct Calls, BUT ALSO BY Class) But I would also continue to think about the ramifications of changing the data domain.

First set yourself up a table of OBSERVED historical probabilities for getting any given call value. Express them as PERFORMANCE PERCENTILES. So in my example, you end up with eight percentile floor cutoffs, like (a made-up example):

Call 1 = 82.2%
Call 2 = 71.1%
Call 3 = 50.7%
Call 4 = 41.3%
Call 5 = 30.8%
Call 6 = 21.7%
Call 7 = 09.5%
Call 8 = 00.0%

Now, for any given formline where you have a horse and he scored a Call of 3, you know he performed AT THE 50.7 PERCENTILE LEVEL OR ABOVE. So throw away his original Call, and substitute his PERCENTILE score. Do that for all of a horses lines. Add up the percentile scores, and divide by the number of lines you used, and you get the horses AVERAGE PERCENTILE SCORE, which you use as a CORRECTED AVERAGE Call

To project the 800 Call on TODAY'S race, simply get the percentile rating for all horses, put them in order, and give the highest horse a projected break of 1. Next highest a projected break of 2, and so on, just using a simple RANKING of the PERCENTILE AVERAGES.

Important Note: To get a more accurate rating for each horse, don't take the FLOOR percentile for that call, but take the mid-point between the floor and the ceiling. For example, if a Horse has a Formline with a call of 3, don't use 50.7 for his score, instead use ((50.7+71.1)/2) which is the midpoint of the percentile step.

The "trick" here is that you are NOT getting a correction for each formline. Instead, you are getting a corrected OVERALL average for the Horse by changing the domain of your data from CALLS to PERCENTILE PERFORMANCE RATINGS.

And finally, and OBVIOUSLY, this general technique is pretty valuable when applied to other problems of this type commonly found in the handicapping world.


Hi!
I was thinking along the same lines, but I also included "Class" since I thought it to be one of the main factors. Have some results but so inconclusive as to be utterly useless.
Have to agree with Crash, that running style, ( I don't have this data and never use it) is probably more important in this instance than anything else.
Next of importance would be the barrier pos. - track condition, combination (hence riding tactics) and that's just to start with, in other words we are looking at an endless array of probable outcomes for little or no return.
I think, that sometimes intuition and experience in handicapping is the best course of action.
One example: yesterday at Sandown race 4, there was a horse called "LION DREAM" form line 0094, nothing to write home about, but if you look at it's last performance on a heavy track and the fact it was obviously improving (0-0-9-4), this was a horse to put some money on, now this decision will never come from systems or even ratings. I am happy to say I had 5*50 on it. And only the ability of a superior jockey beat it to second place.
Good luck
Reply With Quote