I'd love to be able to say that that is exactly my point (the fact that they make no mention of the top fluc minus 5% "deal") but I can't.

Further down the page there is a heading in bold, "Also for thoroughbred punters..." and this is where it mentions top fluc betting.

I don't know why we're arguing about this anyway. Please tell me the rumblings wouldn't be much louder if an Adelaide bookmaker was taking 5% of punter's profits on bets laid at top fluc.