davez, I'm disappointed that you didn't take a stab at the percentage of successful punters, trainers, jockeys and owners in the racing industry. By successful I mean someone making the equivalent of average wages year in year out.

3% ..... yup three lousy percent.

Neurals, as they become increasingly popular and more widely used will have the effect of reducing the odds on top rated horses. OK, so there are a million combinations that could be used, but most punters will use the info in a similar fashion and will end up with similar top rated horses. Now I'm not saying these top rated horses wont win, in fact I believe they will have an impressive strike rate. It's just that the odds won't be there to support the punter to make a profit. So darkydog2002's idea might just be so far from left field that it may have some merit.

davez, I really would appreciate your opinion on my comments re neurals and their popularity, 'cause I rate you very highly indeed and like contrary opinions. Gets me thinking?!