Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Racing
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 18th March 2005, 03:09 PM
Glenno Glenno is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 219
Default 2.85? You're kidding!

An article on the back cover of The Examiner on 18/3/2005 had an headline of D-Day for Deloraine.

Wade Hadley, chairman of stewards of the Tasmanian Turf Club, was joined in yesterday's track inspection by trainers Terry Roles, Graeme McCulloch and Michael Trinder, along with jockeys Troy Atkins, David Pires, Shannon Brazil and Michael Voss and TTC chief executive Robety Biffin.

Wade Hadley reported that the average penetrometer reading for the track (Deloraine) is 2.85, which makes it hard. Recent water restrictions and an inadequate irrigation system kept the reading low.

Has anyone heard of a penetrometer reading lower than 2.85?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22nd March 2005, 11:46 AM
Glenno Glenno is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 219
Default

UPDATE

The stewards will decide later in the week whether the meeting at Deloraine on Easter Monday will go ahead. The penetrometer reading needs to be around the 3.50 mark (it was 2.85 on Thursday).
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18th August 2005, 11:11 AM
Glenno Glenno is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 219
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenno
An article on the back cover of The Examiner on 18/3/2005 had an headline of D-Day for Deloraine.

Wade Hadley, chairman of stewards of the Tasmanian Turf Club, was joined in yesterday's track inspection by trainers Terry Roles, Graeme McCulloch and Michael Trinder, along with jockeys Troy Atkins, David Pires, Shannon Brazil and Michael Voss and TTC chief executive Robety Biffin.

Wade Hadley reported that the average penetrometer reading for the track (Deloraine) is 2.85, which makes it hard. Recent water restrictions and an inadequate irrigation system kept the reading low.

Has anyone heard of a penetrometer reading lower than 2.85?

It was reported later in the day that the penetrometer reading was as low as 1.50 at one part at the track.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18th August 2005, 05:04 PM
Dr Pangloss Dr Pangloss is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 135
Default

EDITED.

Last edited by Moderator 4 : 18th August 2005 at 06:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18th August 2005, 06:42 PM
Moderator 4 Moderator 4 is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 9
Default

Forum Terms of Use do not permit "Personal abuse or unpleasantness."

Please ensure ALL your posts fully comply with the above.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18th August 2005, 09:51 PM
Mark Mark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Qld
Posts: 1,404
Wink

Why would he change the habit of a lifetime.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19th August 2005, 06:17 PM
Dr Pangloss Dr Pangloss is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark
Why would he change the habit of a lifetime.


Thank goodness you're still around - think I lost Kenchar for good!!

Updating us on the state of a Deloraine track five months after the event deserved at least my very polite and humbly put "please explain". But then again, perhaps not.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 22nd August 2005, 02:09 PM
Glenno Glenno is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 219
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Pangloss
Thank goodness you're still around - think I lost Kenchar for good!!

Updating us on the state of a Deloraine track five months after the event deserved at least my very polite and humbly put "please explain". But then again, perhaps not.

Thanks for that comment.

I'm happy to say that the staff did water the track a few days before that meeting, allowing the meeting to go ahead.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:27 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655