Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10th April 2011, 03:42 PM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moeee
I can't see that backing Barrier 1 at ROSEHILL would be profitable, yet backing barrier 2 would not.
I think you might change your mind moeee, if you look at this:
http://www.racenet.com.au/barriers.asp?Track=RHIL

BP1 wins more often than BP2

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10th April 2011, 03:46 PM
mattio mattio is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 268
Default

Those stats also indicate you could back barrier 6 and be just as successful. Seems to me this system is based purely on chance.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10th April 2011, 03:48 PM
moeee moeee is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lomaca
I think you might change your mind moeee, if you look at this:
http://www.racenet.com.au/barriers.asp?Track=RHIL

BP1 wins more often than BP2



IRRELEVANT!

Box 1 on the Greyhounds wins more than any other Box at nearly every venue, at nearly every distance.
You will slowly bleed to death if you back it level stakes every Race.

One thing noticeable about your Graphs - The Massive strike rate for barrier 13 over many distances - Lucky for some.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10th April 2011, 04:09 PM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moeee
IRRELEVANT!

Box 1 on the Greyhounds wins more than any other Box at nearly every venue, at nearly every distance.
You will slowly bleed to death if you back it level stakes every Race.

One thing noticeable about your Graphs - The Massive strike rate for barrier 13 over many distances - Lucky for some.
I didn't make up those stats moeee! they are not mine!!
----------------------------------------------
Agree on box one.

Keep in mind the number of times barrier 13 is used as opposed to barrier 1.

I personally rate barriers 3 to 5 as far better than Bp1 or Bp2 as a general rule, but you have to make a distinction by racetrack and race distance as well.

Again, in general I don't take much notice of barriers over 1600 M.

I'm very new to Greyhounds moeee, only recently started to take interest and I find it much easier to rate than horses.
Followed some of your posts and if and when I can rate them as well as you do, I'll be happy.

Cheers

Last edited by lomaca : 10th April 2011 at 04:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10th April 2011, 04:38 PM
Raven Raven is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 224
Default

Results 1 Jan 2000 to 30 Sep 2009

Starters 2147
Wins 273
Return Unitab $2183.60

I think the results since havent backed up
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10th April 2011, 05:18 PM
beton beton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 589
Default

Straight out barrier win chart is not comparing apples with apples. You need to make a chart for track, distance and field size. Just think how many races have less than 13 runners, Barrier 13 may produce a profit at certain distances in fields of 13 Plus. The barrier 11 at ascot just by having a quick looks like a possible winner also.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10th April 2011, 09:37 PM
Dennis G Dennis G is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 112
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis G
For anyone who's interested, the barrier stats for all Rosehill races from 1st August 1996 to 1998 (I haven't kept the stats going) are -



BP12345678910111213141516
Starters2743274327422741273427012594239020971723132895860433211156
Wins34528727130129026623519916213610864462074
Percent12.58%10.46%9.88%10.98%10.61%9.85%9.06%8.33%7.73%7.89%8.13%6.68%7.62%6.02%6.31%7.14%

Sorry, just reread that, dates should have been '1st August 1996 to 2008'
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11th April 2011, 01:54 PM
darkydog2002 darkydog2002 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 4,332
Talking

It might work if the horse was over $20 and had the letter "R" in its name.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11th April 2011, 02:43 PM
The Ocho The Ocho is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkydog2002
It might work if the horse was over $20 and had the letter "R" in its name.

Why don't they keep stats like that...lol
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11th April 2011, 03:41 PM
darkydog2002 darkydog2002 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 4,332
Smile

Yeah.Ho Ho.
Mind you the odd 100/1 winner covers a lot of duds though.

Last edited by darkydog2002 : 11th April 2011 at 03:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:39 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655