Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 28th April 2010, 12:14 PM
partypooper partypooper is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,383
Default

Wow! Shaun, 75%@$1.85c, you have my admiration, I can't get anywhere near that. It must be the quality of the Ratings.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 28th April 2010, 12:33 PM
Shaun Shaun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 3,456
Default

As i said small sample maybe just some luck, but i did make adjustments to the ratings so i hope it continues.

Here is todays races, lets see the forum curse knock me down, the race times are WA times
Attached Files
File Type: txt 28-Apr-10.txt (3.6 KB, 620 views)
__________________
One Drive

"If the corporates are treating you poorly , just go elsewhere."
"If they need you , they will soon find out."
"If you need them , you will soon find out."
--moeee
_______________________________________________
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 28th April 2010, 03:37 PM
Shaun Shaun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 3,456
Default

Never again, grrrr 2 losses 2 zero return races so far
__________________
One Drive

"If the corporates are treating you poorly , just go elsewhere."
"If they need you , they will soon find out."
"If you need them , you will soon find out."
--moeee
_______________________________________________
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 29th April 2010, 11:33 AM
Jack Jack is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 43
Default Jack

Quote:
Originally Posted by partypooper
Jack, facts are cold, for this plan 30 times out of 100 we would break even, we would then get 20 winners ( IF we are VERY lucky) from the remaining 70 races with a total outlay of 210 points, so we would need an average of $10.10c per winner to just break even......... sorry we are NOT going to get that, the plan cannot win (sorry Bhags)


Hi Party,
Would you explain the arithmetic of your workout ?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 30th April 2010, 09:45 AM
partypooper partypooper is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,383
Default

Morning Jack, well ,say 100 races, 3 bets per race = 300 units bet . In almost all cases the FAV would be in the tipsters top3 and we know that the FAV has 30$ S/R,............. so 30 times it will win in 100 races, we have staked roughly 1/3 of the total outlay per race to break even on the FAV.

So now we have 70 remaining races 3 bets per race = 210 we know that in 70 cases the FAV will NOT win so that takes care of roughly 70 units (taking an ave.of say $3.3) the remainer is split between the 2 remaning conveyances (level stakes) we know that about 20 of these will win (i.e. overall S/R of 50%) we have still 210 units invested, we would have to get $10.10c per winner to just break even overall.

Obviously each individual race will not pan out exactly like that, eg. one race may have $4, $6, $10 so theres 25% on the $4 shot and 37.5% on each of the others, and sometimes of course the $10 will win (roughly 1 time in about 8) conversly sometimes you may have $2, $5, and $12, so you stake 50% on the $2 shot, and 25% on the other 2 etc etc. but over time the stakes will be roughly 1/3 on each, averaged.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 1st May 2010, 06:32 PM
Jack Jack is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 43
Default Jack

Hi Party,
Thank you for your explanatiion
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 4th May 2010, 04:52 AM
Bhagwan Bhagwan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,428
Default

One approach would be to target a race were the other 2 horses total $12.00+ once both prices are added together, after saving on the Fav.
Otherwise no bet race.

E.g.
1st-3.00
2nd- 5.00
3rd - 7.00

This would be a bettable race because the 2nd & 3rd selections add up to $12.00 in price.
__________________
Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 4th May 2010, 05:10 AM
Bhagwan Bhagwan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,428
Default

If targeting the top 3 favs in the live market.

Combined SR 65%
30%
20%
15%

If our average price on the 2nd & 3rd selection is say 6.00 (12.00 combined) at 35% SR
= Ret 210.00

Saving on the Fav Ret 100.00

Total Ret 310+
O/L -----300

We have just mentioned the min possible , there is always the juicy payers in between that make up the big difference.
Just have a look at what some of those 3rd favs pay when they get up where there is a combined $12.00 total for the 2nd & 3rd Fav.

If you have some doubt about this ,start laying them & see what happens to one's bank balance.

Cheers.
__________________
Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 4th May 2010, 09:51 AM
partypooper partypooper is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,383
Default

Sounds good Bhagwan, though my suspicion is that the 65% S/R is including all the shorter ends of the market, as soon as you restrict to price the S/R will be more like 45%. My conclusion is that if you just used this plan occasionally when going to the races or something its ok, (yesterday would have been great) but as a long term winner, I don't think so. As far as laying is concerned well, we can lay every system ever invented and win can't we?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:38 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655