Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 15th December 2016, 07:30 AM
Every Topic Every Topic is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 248
Default Top 5 system

For a long time I have wondered whether it would be possible to have a system where you are betting a number of horses in each race, one per betting account.
For example, let's say you decided to bet on the top 5 by price in every race.
We know that in the long term betting the top 5 in each race doesn't get you a profit.
We also know that the top 5 win something like 75% of all races so the strike rate is good.

Lets say you bet the 1st favourite in your first betting account, the 2nd fave in your 2nd betting account, the 3rd fave in your 3rd account, etc... for all five selections.
I have been trying to get my head around a method of maximising the profit for this.
e.g.When one of the accounts wins, you stop using that account as it is in profit for the day and keep betting with the other accounts until they are in profit.
Would this work? How might it work?
Not being a mathematician the answer doesnt suddenly appear to me.
And I dont think it is something that would be easy to test using a database.

What would be the best strategy to make it work?
Stopping when each account is in profit?
Stopping when you are in profit overall?
Ruling a line under the sequence of bets when you are ahead and start again?

I am not sure, I am just throwing it out there. But for years I have had this gut feeling that it might be a way of minimising risk and making a buck as you will be winning in one of your accounts in most races.
I am using the top 5 prices as an example we can all understand. It might be the top 5 tab numbers, or the top 5 ratings.

What does you guys think? Has anyone been down this path before?
And did it work?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15th December 2016, 08:19 AM
blackdog1 blackdog1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 433
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Every Topic
For a long time I have wondered whether it would be possible to have a system where you are betting a number of horses in each race, one per betting account.
For example, let's say you decided to bet on the top 5 by price in every race.
We know that in the long term betting the top 5 in each race doesn't get you a profit.
We also know that the top 5 win something like 75% of all races so the strike rate is good.

Lets say you bet the 1st favourite in your first betting account, the 2nd fave in your 2nd betting account, the 3rd fave in your 3rd account, etc... for all five selections.
I have been trying to get my head around a method of maximising the profit for this.
e.g.When one of the accounts wins, you stop using that account as it is in profit for the day and keep betting with the other accounts until they are in profit.
Would this work? How might it work?
Not being a mathematician the answer doesnt suddenly appear to me.
And I dont think it is something that would be easy to test using a database.

What would be the best strategy to make it work?
Stopping when each account is in profit?
Stopping when you are in profit overall?
Ruling a line under the sequence of bets when you are ahead and start again?

I am not sure, I am just throwing it out there. But for years I have had this gut feeling that it might be a way of minimising risk and making a buck as you will be winning in one of your accounts in most races.
I am using the top 5 prices as an example we can all understand. It might be the top 5 tab numbers, or the top 5 ratings.

What does you guys think? Has anyone been down this path before?
And did it work?
Only way to do that is dutch betting and you have to do it on fixed odds TAB odds move even after the race started.
But it's still not going to guarantee a profit.

If a system like this would/could work then with today's computers and bots etc. you could eliminate the absolute no hopers and bet on the rest.

I have no idea if someone is doing it or not, if they do and eek out a .5% profit they would do well on turnover

Mostly betting on dogs myself and I do bet up to 3 at most for win usually 2 but only if the odds are there. Mostly place bets for me though.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15th December 2016, 08:35 AM
demodocus demodocus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 133
Smile

Mr Chien Noir was being very gentle with you, but then he's that sort of bloke.

PLEASE DON'T DO IT.

Rather than attempt this possibility just send me a cheque every week in the amount of your gambling budget. It'll save you the heartache of hundreds of hours of form study, you won't have to waste your afternoons watching prices, trying to match todays horses with some complicated (and erroneous) sure-fire, can't lose method/system.

I'll enjoy the cheque (rather than the TAB/bookie) and you'll be no worse off despite your best efforts.

The ONLY way you can make money in punting is by identifying horses that all hands and the cook have mispriced.

I wish you well
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15th December 2016, 10:00 AM
Mark Mark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Qld
Posts: 2,023
Default

I agree, don't do it.

But this statement is far from true............"The ONLY way you can make money in punting is by identifying horses that all hands and the cook have mispriced".
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15th December 2016, 11:43 AM
Shaun Shaun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 5,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark
I agree, don't do it.

But this statement is far from true............"The ONLY way you can make money in punting is by identifying horses that all hands and the cook have mispriced".

Beat me to it
__________________
"If the corporates are treating you poorly , just go elsewhere."
"If they need you , they will soon find out."
"If you need them , you will soon find out."
--moeee
_______________________________________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15th December 2016, 04:57 PM
partypooper partypooper is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 3,964
Default

Viva "power play" for e.g.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15th December 2016, 05:26 PM
Every Topic Every Topic is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 248
Default

Interestingly, if I had employed this method today...

after the 2nd race I would have been a total of 5 units up. This would have been my stop point for the whole thing.

After the 4th race, 4 of the 5 accounts would have had a win and I would have been 11.5 units up.

Have a great day and good luck.
:-)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15th December 2016, 05:59 PM
Shaun Shaun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 5,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Every Topic
Interestingly, if I had employed this method today...

after the 2nd race I would have been a total of 5 units up. This would have been my stop point for the whole thing.

After the 4th race, 4 of the 5 accounts would have had a win and I would have been 11.5 units up.

Have a great day and good luck.
:-)


I could test this for you using unitab dividends after the race, won't be perfect but may give an idea.

The biggest issue will be sequence of races, i can do all venues race 1 then race 2 and so on but i can't do it in exact race order as they jump.
__________________
"If the corporates are treating you poorly , just go elsewhere."
"If they need you , they will soon find out."
"If you need them , you will soon find out."
--moeee
_______________________________________________

Last edited by Shaun : 15th December 2016 at 06:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15th December 2016, 11:54 PM
blackdog1 blackdog1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 433
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaun
I could test this for you using unitab dividends after the race, won't be perfect but may give an idea.

The biggest issue will be sequence of races, i can do all venues race 1 then race 2 and so on but i can't do it in exact race order as they jump.
Shaun I don't use excel but I'm sure you can sort your races by jump time ascending?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 16th December 2016, 05:16 AM
thorns thorns is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 693
Default

What is the reasoning behind having 5 betting accounts? Are you not better just using the one account that is broken into 5 banks?

Or have I misinterpreted the original post?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:41 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655