|
|
To advertise on these forums, e-mail us. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Email Sent Speedy
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
I never should have looked at that website Speedy. I layed a 40:1 shot Race 2 Scone based on the jockeys win strike rate. The worst I've ever seen: 1% 484 races for 6 wins!! E Weiszbach just had win No. 7.
RP |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
It's amazing how that can happen. I know that when I tried trading if I chose to let an oustanding lay go in running it seemed to win every time. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Perhaps you should look at it based on the law of averages. If a jockey usually runs at 5% and is running now at 1% then he should be backed not layed as his strike rate will return to 5% longer term. And the reverse is true lay jockeys which have a much higher strike rate (double) then the longer term (350 races) average. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Cheers RP |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The longest price I have got in running on a leader which won is $33. Last edited by SpeedyBen : 20th April 2013 at 10:33 AM. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Thats still a 2% strike rate. If her last win was 400 races ago then perhaps its coming due eventually. If I was using these stats then I would steer clear of laying her until she had her win and then look if she was above her average and could therefore be layed again. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Have a great day all, RP |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|