|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi all,
Just got a hypothetical question for you guys. I'm just looking at something which involves laying certain horses in the price bracket of $2 to $3 on Betfair. What would be the best way to do this - laying at level stakes or laying to liability? I cannot give you the stats or percentage of winners/losers involved because I don't know myself (maybe someone could help with this). I'm just wanting to know what may be the best way to go. Taking commission out of the equation for now and just using simple numbers we get the following: Laying minimum $5 level stakes Price $2.00 - Lay win $5 - Lay loss $5 Price $2.50 - Lay win $5 - Lay loss $7.50 Price $3.00 - Lay win $5 - Lay loss $10 Laying say to $10 Liability (so minimum $5 lay bet requirement is met) Price $2.00 - Lay win $10 - Lay loss $10 Price $2.50 - Lay win $7.50 - Lay loss $10 Price $3.00 - Lay win $5 - Lay loss $10 Is there really a difference? Level stakes means you lose less on the lower priced horses which are expected to win more often HOWEVER liability means you win more when a lower priced horse wins. Is one better than the other?
__________________
Never give up on a dream just because of the time it will take to accomplish it. The time will pass anyway.” ― Earl Nightingale |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ocho
Ideally with laying you want to win the same on your longer priced selns as you do on the shorter ones because they are going to lose ( win for you ) more often, statistically speaking. So, in my actual experience, I would always have won more laying a stake not to a liability ( I have done lots of xls studies to prove this ). However, since I like laying longshots I use the liability method because I don't want to wake up in the morning having laid a 330/1 winner. In practical terms the worst loser I have laid in the UK in the last 6 months was about 33/1 so I wouldn't have woken to a nightmare. With the low price range you mention I reckon you will be slightly better off laying a stake but in that narrow range there should not be much of a difference. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() It depends on the edge.
Is your edge fluent across all odds ranges or is the edge towards the shorter or longer end? Laying to fixed stake can be better, but laying to liability can also be better as it magnifies your edge if it's towards the shorter end. The simple answer is, it is not the same. It will be different one way or another.
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software. Now with over 420,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races! http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html *RaceCensus now updated to 30/06/2025 Video overview of RaceCensus here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thanks guys. I've just broken the odds range down to 10c increments with the following results but I had been using a $30 liability for testing.
2.00-2.10.....-13.78 2.12-2.20.....193.26 2.22-2.30.....163.16 2.32-2.40.....-3.72 2.42-2.50.....144.48 2.52-2.60.....204.56 2.62-2.70.....120.96 2.72-2.80.....56.34 2.82-2.90.....76.75 2.92-3.00.....-56.59 I've now changed the last increment up to just 2.92 (back fitting or what) giving me.....46.86 (instead of -56.59). That's +988 for laying with $30 liability (no commission deducted though). It is only 134 bets though however so it's probably running really hot (or cold as it's laying) right now. There have been 34 losing lay bets out of those 134 races to date (75% SR). Do the above figures give anyone any idea if level stakes or liability would be better?
__________________
Never give up on a dream just because of the time it will take to accomplish it. The time will pass anyway.” ― Earl Nightingale |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Yes 134 bets isn't enough, but at this stage you're better off laying to a fixed stake.
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software. Now with over 420,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races! http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html *RaceCensus now updated to 30/06/2025 Video overview of RaceCensus here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thanks very much Chrome Prince.
__________________
Never give up on a dream just because of the time it will take to accomplish it. The time will pass anyway.” ― Earl Nightingale |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|