
10th January 2012, 03:51 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,561
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by woof43
Once you have tested and found all the variables that work to some degree, that is the odds step down smoothly, you start to then categorize the favourites. This where you earn your money, there are infinite ways of doing this, i'll leave this up to you, but do a lot of thinking, success depends on how well you can learn to categorize races.
Your next step is to then go back thru your historical database for races that match each categorization. Then from your actual observations (statistically speaking), you then develop a probabilty matrix for every runner in each race or down as far as you can.
Should'nt be too hard to work out where it is all going now.
Obviously the categorizing is the key. pick a bad category you botch the race, but fortunately there is a fair amount of "forgiveness", but once you study this a little and eliminate the obvious bad way of doing things, it's not too hard.
I remember in the late 90's this type of categorizing was being developed where they had limited set "probability" tables but now with super computers set ups such as in HK, can develop far more complex catergory models and then "on the fly" search thru your database spaces searching for exact matches.
Something to think about
|
I am going to assume there is only a small subset of variables that step down semi smoothly with the odds. Barrier is going to be one I am sure.
When you say categorise favourites/races I am a little confused. Im not sure what you mean by categories. Are we categorising favourites based on the variables we found ? or based on something else ? Im confused.
hmmm ... I jsut reread it and I am still confused. Im trying to work out how this is different to just a set of mechanical rules ?
We have categorised things based on odds and not profit .... But how does this help. sorry I know it muyst be frustrating for you to try and point this out to me but its frustrating the ******** out of me that I can't understand it.
|