here is a small list of trusted names that i know have data bases...forgive me if i leave anyone out...we all know the trusted people

Bhagwan
Chrome Prince
Sportz (not sure if has a data base)

generaly if they havem more than 300 posts they are probably ok....sorry if i left anyone out

Hi Positive Peter,
I have a 4 year data base which cost me several thousand dollars TRB(The Ratings Bureau).
One could shell out the money or one could request a scan through our data base & I could email it back to you.
bhk at bigpond dot net dot au

System ideas are funny things , I have researched things say over 2000 races which worked well only to find the next 2000 races fell into a hole never to be seen again , so keep an open mind when analysing the shifting sands of form analysis.

__________________
Cheers.

Shaun!
So you think the quantity of the posts makes someone trustworthy? I could point out a few people here with over a thousand posts, hardly any is worth reading.
If I have nothing to contribute to the discussion I keep quiet.
I am sorry if foxwood had a bad experience, the people here represent the cross section of the population, so it can happen.
Cheers

Ahhh no, sorry. I don't. Probably should though. I'm often bugging others to help me check ideas out.

yes i agree...but my short list of names is the way to go

Gee Shaun, I don't think I or any other forum member here for that matter, have ever met you. Yet you have worked out who among us is honest and who isn't and even supplied a public 'honesty list' [heck, I never made it] for all new members to benefit from !!!

What unique and amazing insight do you posses to have come up with this short list ? I and I'm sure others here, would love to know what criteria we have to meet to get on it.

Personally, I would utilise any system sent to me for testing that showed a nice profit, as I'm sure the [only] 3 honest members of this forum you have conveniently named would too, as I don't think stupidity is a necessary attribute of honesty.

Just in case you are formulating any other lists Shaun, 'naivety' is certainly an attribute that you should consider for your 'inappropriate posters' list.

Gees....just forget it then....let him take his chancesj with any one that replies to his request....i put the first three names that i couls think of that i have had dealings with......the question was who could he trust....well the three that i named i have had good results from and are more than willing to share ideas.....would they use a good system that they had been give....sure they would......would they sell it on....don't think so.

Crash, I think Shaun was just trying to provide the names of guys with good databases that maybe able to help out Peter, I dont think for one minute that he meant that they were the only ones on the forum to be trusted.

Must get 300 posts up !!!!

Wanna be one of the in crowd, must keep posting.