|
|
To advertise on these forums, e-mail us. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I don't know. Would have been nice to have more, but it could work out okay I reckon. After all, with only 4 people involved, it means we've each got VERY strong teams and we didn't have to pick a whole lot of people that we didn't really want. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Arrgh i completely forgot about the draft...
oh well, managed to get Cox, Pavlich and Riewoldt so not all bad the teams you get with 4 participants are a aaaa of a lot better than the ones you get with 16 trust me haha its going to be very tough picking a 22 |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
let's get going with some trades....
i've got a pretty weak backline, looking for some top class backs.,... anyone interested in Goodwin, Pendlebury, Simmonds, Van Berlo, S.Burgoyne... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Sportz...
Birchall and Priddis for Newman and Pendlebury? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
schmucta...
goddard, fisher, dalziell for batemen, newman, pendlebury |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Sportz -
was i close with Swan, Fevola for Lloyd, Tuck? i thought you would have taken that |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
No way. Swan and Fevola are two players I wanted all along.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone want Nick Stevens for a decent Back
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
No, sorry mate. Looks like everyone's got the same problem. You can sign one of the backs from all the hundreds of players not already chosen. That's what I've done.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
No worries mate, cheers
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|