Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 5th July 2012, 02:39 PM
garyf garyf is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 366
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by garyf
Putting a bet on without not knowing my return v/s risk,
Is not my way of doing things.


Betting market.
Stock market.
Share market.

If you don't look at the market, any market, how can,
You know if a profit can be achieved before you invest?.

What's your thoughts?.

Cheers.
I guess technically you can.
Lets say i put 3 bets on the night before,
And i look at the results 24 hours later.
Technically you have won without looking at the market.

But that's not me.

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 5th July 2012, 02:43 PM
garyf garyf is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 366
Smile

RE POST=31.

iF THEY WIN AT A DIVIDEND GREATER THAN YOU OUTLAY.

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 5th July 2012, 02:49 PM
garyf garyf is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 366
Question

Or you can set up a bot and just crunch nos,
By backing and laying is another way i guess.

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 5th July 2012, 02:54 PM
jose jose is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: brisbane
Posts: 419
Talking

It is unlikely that god's plan for the universe includesmaking you rich.


The older I get the more I see this is true.
__________________
Jose'.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 5th July 2012, 03:01 PM
jose jose is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: brisbane
Posts: 419
Default

Yes LG, but the strength or lack of it, of money for a horse is determined by how it has been performing, be it recent or otherwise, therefore PAST is king.
__________________
Jose'.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 5th July 2012, 03:28 PM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jose
Yes LG, but the strength or lack of it, of money for a horse is determined by how it has been performing, be it recent or otherwise, therefore PAST is king.
What about factors since the last run / rating,
Which remain unknown to us but not to those,
Who place $$$(or dont) on the nose before it jumps?

Eg condition on day of race

This is not about the past - all about the present,
And we can only get a hint of this via the price ie NOW,
Unless we are on track with clear-clever eyes?

LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 5th July 2012, 03:30 PM
Barny Barny is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,091
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jose
Yes LG, but the strength or lack of it, of money for a horse is determined by how it has been performing, be it recent or otherwise, therefore PAST is king.

Not only that particular horse, but all the others over the years with similar form in a similar events too. HISTORY is the only guide we have.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 5th July 2012, 03:48 PM
jose jose is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: brisbane
Posts: 419
Default

Spot on B.
__________________
Jose'.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 5th July 2012, 03:54 PM
Vortech
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I also find it funny today when the boss commented to me about the Carlton v Collingwood match. He ask who I was backing.

I said Collingwood by the form.

He replied but your not going to look at how many times Carlton have won at that ground, the margin last start, the ground condition they played last time, the weight of Chris Judd and Swann. The coach of the sides. You do all this for horse racing.

Are these factors like Win % and Place % that we use iirelevant in more cases than none.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 5th July 2012, 04:10 PM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,237
Default

If HISTORY is the only guide we use,
Then we will forever be on the loosing side I feel.

You can forget all about Pareto!

More like 99/1 rule being,
99% of us loose in the long run because the clever 1% leverage off
a. readily available historical information better
b. additional info(=edge) unavailable to the 99%

The only path I see for us to move from 99 - 1% is in the MARKET = price movements which reflect what we know about past events, and what we don't.

Surely it is the BEST guide we have?

LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:48 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655