Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41  
Old 18th April 2008, 06:16 PM
crash crash is offline
Suspended.
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
Default

BENDIGO
6/13 x
DUBBO
3/5 [7.90w 4.00p]
7/8 [$1.70p]
MACKAY
5/8 [$4.60p]
8/12 x

Someone might want to check these results.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 18th April 2008, 07:48 PM
Mancunian Mancunian is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 172
Default ICE BREAKER

I broke even today - thank god, I could use the money !
an oldie, but a goodie.
Come on guys - aren't we all friends deep down with a common goal.

cheers Mancunian
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 19th April 2008, 08:19 AM
Bhagwan Bhagwan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,428
Default

Hay, I'm partial to a little fancy fiddle playen.

I think our friend, now finally knows, what it feels like & why others have become cranky in the past, leave the site & never post a thing ever again.

That's how sites become very quiet.

There are some fools out there who say they do it just to get a gee-up out of people, as a form of weird joke, well no one ever laughs, except the sole, mouth breathing fool, just like a teenage bully does.

There are also some who see themselves as some sort of policeman & beleive its their right to attack wild ideas in the name of protecting the average punter from losing all their money , yet never make a positive posting on how to make or protect the punting money to replace the idea, that they are attacking, no matter how wild & woolly the idea may be.

My favourite, are the ones who go through all the postings & critisise others spelling & grammar- Weird! But never contibute anything positive about punting.

I would personally like to see those who have felt they have been bullied into silence by the bullies, making their, valuable contributions known once more, no matter how wild the ideas may be .
Dont let the bully boys get the upper hand , make it known to them that their nasty nonscence is offensive & you dont like . Maybe an official complaint to the moderator could be in order.
Maybe the fool bully boys can laugh that one off aswell.

Now, where's that fiddle of mine.
__________________
Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 19th April 2008, 08:57 AM
stugots stugots is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crash
BENDIGO
6/13 x
DUBBO
3/5 [7.90w 4.00p]
7/8 [$1.70p]
MACKAY
5/8 [$4.60p]
8/12 x

Someone might want to check these results.


did you actually back em this time or do you need to "I only realized I hadn't won on the horse after checking my betting account after you pointed out the mistake." again?

this is hilarious
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 19th April 2008, 11:22 AM
jfc jfc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Sydney
Posts: 402
Default

Yesterday elsewhere I experienced an incident which will occupy a prominent place in my burgeoning scrap book.

In response to an implication that I was incapable of comprehending flat staking, I calculated flat staking of a modest $1,000 over the disclosed 2,000 bets at 35% S/R and 35% POT. An eye-opening $700,000 profit.

But that objective information was deleted, and today a Kelly Staking calculation met the same fate.

This means that certain people there can claim any S/R or POT they choose and remain protected from my objective observations.

Kinda' like those who pumped Davnet up to $3 billion before reality pricked.

Now by contrast from what I can see here Crash published his picks beforehand, then claimed a winner that was not there.

How can that be anything but an innocent oversight?

If you want to malevolently claim fictitious winning figures, then you don't publish picks beforehand which everyone can verify.

Instead you might just claim extravagant S/R + POT with no corroborating evidence, or go p57's celebrated route of having very fluid rules which only get disclosed after any long-shot bolts in.

The massive outrage over what was clearly no more than a mistake again says far more about the accusers than the target.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 19th April 2008, 03:41 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,367
Default

Yep, it just won - Sebring.

See.... I told you
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 402,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 31/05/2024
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 19th April 2008, 04:16 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,367
Default

Pointless being in a competition crash, as it doesn't reflect either the way I bet, nor the odds I take.

I'm not good at picking winners, I've always held that belief, my niche is punting to value, and laying poor value.

My competitions don't have a start and an end, they are forever ongoing.

Working out profit or loss using TAB dividends is like working out wages in India for me.

If I can't get over or under a certain price, I pass.
Sometimes I can't get the price, I'll trade on the race, knowing the ants will come out of the hill to feed and drive the market into a nice slice of profit.

Give me a competition that works this way, and you have a serious challenge on your hands

So far this week, I've more than doubled my bank on UK racing using 2% flat stakes to liability

It's all about price I reckon.
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 402,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 31/05/2024
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 19th April 2008, 05:16 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,367
Default

O.K. if you have no Betfair account we can't play, it really would have been fun, regardless of us having a go at eachother here.
It would have been a pretty good battle I reckon - it's a shame.

The only rules were work out the profit per unit after a month and supply the Betfair account summary and csv file for verification.

That was it - no other rules.
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 402,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 31/05/2024
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 21st April 2008, 05:43 AM
Bhagwan Bhagwan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,428
Default

Chrome raises an interesting point for all punters.

That is... a punter has to ask himself the question, am I more intersted in hitting a winning profit or am I more interested in hitting a volumn of winners.

Cheers.
__________________
Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 21st April 2008, 08:36 AM
crash crash is offline
Suspended.
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
Default

I think it's an interesting point too. Perhaps he should create a thread on it?
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 10:57 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655