Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 31st January 2005, 11:24 AM
Adrian
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up Odds-On , Get-On ???

I have recently been analysing my IAS betting account, looking for patterns in my results over the past 18 months or so. During that time I have concentrated most of my bettibng on Pro-punter's "Super Specials", but limited to Melbourne and Sydney only, where I can bet at Top Fluctuation in a reasonably "Fair" market framed to around 105%.

What has become evident is that most of my profit seems to be coming from odds-on winners, where I seem to have around an 85% strike rate at an average price of something like $1.80. (For the mathematicians that's someting like a 53% profit on turnover ie. 10 units bet for 15.3 units return)

Have any other Pro-punter members noticed the same phenomenon ??
Unfortunately my data is a little limited - eg I am not sure as to how many horses rated at odds-on by Proputer have won at odds of $2plus.

Can anyone help out with more precise data ?
I seem to have identified something like 17 winners and 3 losers at odds-on since the super specials were introduced.

Does Propunter have records of the rated odds given to Super Specials ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31st January 2005, 12:47 PM
Neil Neil is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 804
Default

Hello,
Maybe you have included a few of the horses winning that were assessed at $2.00. But from a small sample there has been over a 90% winning strike rate when we assessed a horse at odds on, our minimum value odds were available and the TF was $2.00 or shorter.
Cheers, Neil
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 1st February 2005, 12:11 PM
Adrian
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Smile

Thanks Neil,
It certainly seems like Propunter has had great sucess in picking those "true" odds-on favourites. - granted however that it is a limited sample size.

It does however give me quite a degree of confidence in backing super special selections even when at odds-on. Previously I have been hesitant to back horses when odds-on.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 3rd February 2005, 07:49 PM
Dirk Gently Dirk Gently is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 55
Default

I'm also been analysing my profit per odds segment and I'm just breaking even in the <$2 segment but am finding okay profits when my top selection is beween $3 and $5. Above $5 is good but I don't have a large enough sample size to get excited about it. The trouble with following odds on runners is that you don't need much luck to make a profit for a few months straight but then if the luck turns it becomes a "death of a thousand cuts" whereby you win a bit, lose a little bit more and so on. I spent 88 bets, $476 just to graft $20 back at just over 5% POT on odds on horses. Thats a lot of work for a result that could have gone the other way, so I avoid them now. If you can sustain your 50%+ POT then you'd be mad to stop though.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 4th February 2005, 10:00 AM
brave chief brave chief is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 325
Default

I assume the Specials at 1/1 or better are making a tidy profit? Stick to them.

Taking the odds-on is exactly what your bookie wants you to do.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:59 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655