Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 15th February 2007, 07:03 PM
crash crash is offline
Suspended.
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
Smile 3 men paid $30 for a room...

3 men paid $10 each for a $30 room at a motel.
Later that night the manager came in and said no, that room is only $25 not $30 and told the Bell-hop to give them back $5. The Bell-hop thought 3 into $5 won't go, so I'll pocket $2 and give them $1 each. Each man has therefore paid $9 each for the room.

The Bell-hop pocketed $2 and each man has been given $1 back thereby paying $9 each. 3x$9 = $27 + the $2 the Bell-hop pocketed. What happened to the missing $1 from the original $30 ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15th February 2007, 07:10 PM
mad mad is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 898
Default

I'll have a go:

25/3 = 8.33333 +1 = 9.33333*3 = 28 +2 = 30
__________________
I like Bing Lee.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16th February 2007, 04:33 AM
crash crash is offline
Suspended.
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
Default

That doesn't explain what happened to the missing dollar in real terms.
Who was given what and who got the extra dollar? There where no cents handed out, only dollars changed hands as originally described.

56 views and no correct answer. No wonder 95% of punters lose :-)

Last edited by crash : 16th February 2007 at 04:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 16th February 2007, 05:09 AM
jfc jfc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Sydney
Posts: 402
Default

Briefly:

The correct formula is:

27 - 2 = 25


That is the hop pocketed $2 from the $27 paid for the room. Leaving the manager with $25.


27 + 2 is inappropriate

That would describe the situation where instead of pocketing $2, the hop curiously donated another $2 on top of that paid to the manager.

---

For the record I did work that out from scratch, even though I had a vague recollection of where to find the answer on the Internet.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 16th February 2007, 05:21 AM
crash crash is offline
Suspended.
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
Default

Well done JFC.

The answer only required a bit of solid reasoning. Interestingly, apparently 70% more women than men work out the answer to that riddle. Probably because they do far more small money transactions than men [?]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 16th February 2007, 10:22 PM
AssumeTheCrown AssumeTheCrown is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Gippsland, Victoria
Posts: 223
Default

This riddle has the same reasoning and effect as the 11 fingers scenario where you count backwards your 5 fingers on your left hand 10,9,8,7,6... and then add your 5 fingers on your right hand to say you have 6+5=11 fingers. Not mathematically viable but it looks good.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:48 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655