Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 23rd November 2005, 09:29 AM
Chinbok Chinbok is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 50
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sportz
Do you count Ipswich as a metropolitan track??? If so, then R7-6 looks like a selection there tomorrow.

If not, then I guess these are the only selections for tomorrow:
Cant R2-5
Cant R6-2
Ascot R7-5

Is that right???
I class Ipswich as a provincial track.

I don't bet in Fillies only races so won't be on Cant R2-5. Ascot R7-5 and Cant R6-2 are qualifiers.

Last edited by Chinbok : 23rd November 2005 at 09:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 23rd November 2005, 09:32 AM
Sportz Sportz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,066
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chinbok
I don't bet in Fillies only races so won't be on Cant R2-5.


It's scratched anyway.

Do you have any minimum or maximum number of starters?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 23rd November 2005, 10:08 AM
Chinbok Chinbok is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 50
Default

I don't actually use this system as I don't have the patience for a 20% SR. If I was I would use a field size of 5 to 16. Field sizes outside of this range have made a loss but there have only been < 10 races in total so probably too small a sample.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 26th November 2005, 07:52 AM
Spazattack
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirk Gently
Getting back to the use of neurals, I've always put emphasis on the JT rating. How does it correlate to winners? I have generally ignored the timeform rating as it has a very high variance, particularly on weekdays but maybe I'm missing something. Cheers.

I am not a big fan of JT. JA is the best influence of JA, JT and TA.
TIM is as right as it is wrong.

Here are five neural settings to mess about with:

CP2, JA1, TA1, CRS2, DIS1, $2

CP3, CF1, JA3, TA1, DIS1

JA2, CRS2, $2

CP1, CF1, JA1, BP1, DIS1, $1

JA2, JT1, $1

The first mentioned setting is by far the most consistent I have ever come across. Plenty of winners in the top two or three, particularly in the bush.

The two settings which begin with JA, come up with some great winners from time to time.

However you use the neurals, there is still work to be done beyond coming up with a selection order.

For instance, take the top two from either setting (1) or (2). Of the top two selections, by taking the top mentioned runner from either of the JA settings,will improve the win strike rate.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:03 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655