darky what the guys are saying is they've given you more then 1 example of horses winning in your given test period where you state you've had 1 winner and they've found multiple and you won't address why that is the case.

Is there an additional rule you've haven't shared or something? Because as far as I can see these guys have a valid point on a number of additional horses winning in the timeframe you've given that you haven't accounted for?

Cheers