Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
Reload this Page A Profitable Angle
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
Page 5 of 5 < 1 2 3 4 5
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41  
Old 10th March 2011, 02:18 AM
peakester peakester is offline
Banned
  
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Tony Peake
Posts: 62
Default
"If you incude unplaced overall the figures show a 8.7% profit but you drop the bets to 1/5 of action".

Sorry to bother you Wesmip, do u mean by adding a further filter - ie unplaced at horses last start, the profit improves to 8.7%

Cheers Tony
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 10th March 2011, 05:33 PM
wesmip1 wesmip1 is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,601
Default
Yes thats right. But you only have 1/5 the bets. So it depends on whether POT or P is your primary objective.

If you lose 80% of the bets for only a 4% incrase in profit over turnover is it worth it.

1000 at 4% profit = $40
200 at 8% profit = $16

Which do you prefer ?
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 21st March 2011, 07:24 PM
Stix Stix is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,013
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by wesmip1
thanks stix and vortech.

Stix,

Sent you an email.

Vortech,
That was a very good run down of the neurals.

I agree JA is a good one to use and I find it a good filter to apply to most ratings.


I also agree with the speed maps. I record them as well. I can say that if a horse is classed as a OM on R&S then you should avoid it. For some reason they perform even worse the BK. Leaders and Pacers are the ones to be on. OP are overbet and provide little value. Midfeild goes ok though.

Anyway thanks for your take on the neurals. Very intersting info which I will go play with now.
Any feedback on the neural methods I sent you through mate?
__________________
Stix
.......Giddy Up..... !!
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 21st March 2011, 09:30 PM
wesmip1 wesmip1 is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,601
Default
Stix,

Short answer is no.

I have been trialling so many new systems lately on a new angle that I just have not had time. I will look into it by this weekend and get back to you.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 25th March 2011, 12:19 AM
Stix Stix is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,013
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by wesmip1
Stix,

Short answer is no.

I have been trialling so many new systems lately on a new angle that I just have not had time. I will look into it by this weekend and get back to you.
Sure thing...
__________________
Stix
.......Giddy Up..... !!
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 29th March 2011, 10:00 AM
New punter New punter is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 5
Default
Hi Guys,

As I mentioned earlier in another post I am quite a new punter, I have been reveiwing this thread and really like the methadocial nature of this selection system.

I have attempted to prepare the selections myself, however I have one question that would be helpfull if you could address?

When using the neural seetins, I have set the CP to 5 and everything else to 0 is this correct? Or if not are you able to advise what settings you are using for this method?

Furthermore what are you suppose to do when the Uni TAB top rater is teh same?

Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 29th March 2011, 06:58 PM
wesmip1 wesmip1 is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,601
Default
Quote:
When using the neural seetins, I have set the CP to 5 and everything else to 0 is this correct? Or if not are you able to advise what settings you are using for this method?

Yes that is one way to do it. Or you can just look at the CP column without changing the settings.

Quote:
Furthermore what are you suppose to do when the Uni TAB top rater is teh same?

Only 1 top unitab rating should amtch the top cp. In the results if there were 2 cp's that matched 2 top unitab ratings then they were both included (but not sure if this ever happened).
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 30th March 2011, 09:48 AM
New punter New punter is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 5
Default
Thanks Wesmip.

It appeares yesterday there was one selection which ran second at Sale Race 7 no 1.

One further question if you dont mind, I notice that if you change the other columns in the R&S worksheet it changes the FR, Is this method based on using the default FR or am I meant to adjust that somehow?

Thanks again!
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 31st March 2011, 07:09 AM
wesmip1 wesmip1 is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,601
Default
default only
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 5 of 5 < 1 2 3 4 5

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:40 AM.

Contact Us - OZmium Pty Ltd - Archive - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655