Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Sports and Gambling
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11th June 2004, 04:10 PM
goldmember goldmember is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: newcastle
Posts: 1,543
Default

which is the better bet to win ? hewitt or roddick
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11th June 2004, 04:12 PM
breadman breadman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Border NSW/QLD
Posts: 374
Default

RODDICK i think hewitt is past his best maybe to much spare time with kim might be a problem too!!!! hehehe
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11th June 2004, 04:19 PM
goldmember goldmember is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: newcastle
Posts: 1,543
Default

i was taking a multi and knowing my luck 1 will win and 1 will lose, so i want to take the better option
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11th June 2004, 04:23 PM
breadman breadman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Border NSW/QLD
Posts: 374
Default

That was my weird sense of humour coming into play goldmember but i have a lot of time for roddick as a player its just a pity he is american. He could be anything if he could curb his anger. But then again the same can be said about a lot of players on the tour including hewitt. Good luck with your bet.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11th June 2004, 04:26 PM
goldmember goldmember is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: newcastle
Posts: 1,543
Default

so you would go roddick anyway
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11th June 2004, 06:12 PM
Mr J Mr J is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 759
Default

No Hewitt would be better value.

Chip is dangerous and Roddick is more of a publiv player (ie bookies will shade him more than a few cents).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11th June 2004, 06:18 PM
moeee moeee is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
Default

Quote:
On 2004-06-11 18:12, Mr J wrote:
No Hewitt would be better value.

Chip is dangerous and Roddick is more of a publiv player (ie bookies will shade him more than a few cents).


The Hewitt bit I understand.

Could someone please translate.
"Chip","publiv","shade".

Owboutcha Unlucky Phil.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11th June 2004, 06:42 PM
Mr J Mr J is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 759
Default

Chip is the nickname for Srichaphan.

publiv is a typo, should read 'public'.

Shade is devaluing devalue. I.e, if a book knows the majority of action will come on a favourite, he'll make him a little shorter to get more value out of it.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12th June 2004, 12:02 AM
peanutz peanutz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 281
Default

Quote:
On 2004-06-11 16:10, goldmember wrote:
which is the better bet to win ? hewitt or roddick


Hewitt of course, not Andy Pandy!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12th June 2004, 12:13 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

i'll say hewitt
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:57 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655