Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 19th January 2007, 06:26 PM
Mr. Logic Mr. Logic is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 243
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crash
Only if all facts are known can 'accurate' ratings .... be produced.
If they could be produced, that would mean you would know the winner of almost every race [have to allow for the odd horse falling over etc.


I'm sorry Crash, but this is just illogical.

Is the winner of the Caulfield Cup each year a certainty? If not, why should "accurate" ratings be asked to do the impossible?

By your definition of "accurate", it is impossible for any ratings to be "accurate" no matter how good they are because in order to be "accurate" according to your definition they must defy the laws of logic and consistently select horses to win that are not mathematical certainties to win!!
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 20th January 2007, 06:52 AM
crash crash is offline
Suspended.
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
Default

I'm not being illogical Mr Logic. Unless giving correct meaning to the English language is being illogical.

According to my dictionary there is nothing wrong with my definition of the word 'accurate':

"conforming exactly or almost exactly or to a standard or performing with total accuracy."

Chrome obviously meant 'very consistent' ratings [to his personally set standard of acceptance] and not 'very accurate' ratings, according to the explanation in his last post.

Consistent: "Marked by an orderly, logical, aesthetically consistent relation of parts". Seems to fit the bill I think.

Last edited by crash : 20th January 2007 at 07:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 20th January 2007, 01:39 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,366
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crash
I'm not being illogical Mr Logic. Unless giving correct meaning to the English language is being illogical.

According to my dictionary there is nothing wrong with my definition of the word 'accurate':

"conforming exactly or almost exactly or to a standard or performing with total accuracy."

Chrome obviously meant 'very consistent' ratings [to his personally set standard of acceptance] and not 'very accurate' ratings, according to the explanation in his last post.

Consistent: "Marked by an orderly, logical, aesthetically consistent relation of parts". Seems to fit the bill I think.


crash, I can see why you challenged the statement.

It is more important that the ratings are consistent, but they must be accurate, not in selecting the "right" horse each time, but in assessing the chances of each horse overall - longterm.

The distribution of strike rate and loss on turnover should relate almost exactly to the TAB prices and rankings.

If I knew the final TAB dividend for each horse, I wouldn't need ratings at all
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 400,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 30/04/2024
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 20th January 2007, 02:15 PM
crash crash is offline
Suspended.
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
Default

Thanks Chrome, I get the picture.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 20th January 2007, 05:47 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,366
Default

Here's an example of the way I was talking about accuracy...

Of the last 97 bets on top rated horses...

Overall they returned a loss on turnover
-TAB -6.91%
-Bookie Fixed Odds -5.05%

Where I was able to obtain an overlay on Betfair 42.42% POT

Where they drifted on the tote from the rated price
-TAB -12.67%
-Bookie Fixed Odds -28.56%

Where I was able to obtain an overlay on Betfair 7.17% POT

Where they firmed on the tote from the rated price
-TAB -1.92%
-Bookie Fixed Odds +15.29%

Where I was able to obtain an overlay on Betfair 72.93% POT

And that is just on the bet side.

If you account for the TAB takeout of 14.50% and also the Bookie Fixed Odds takeout of up to 30% (in some cases), things look pretty good.
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 400,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 30/04/2024
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg

Last edited by Chrome Prince : 20th January 2007 at 05:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 20th January 2007, 10:52 PM
wesmip1 wesmip1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,601
Default

Chrome,

I hate to say this but I think there are not many people that can follow what you are doing except the delect few who are dedicated or who can buy/write a database for themselves on the results and ratings.

I can easily do what you are doing and do it as well as it is quite a profitable way to invest ... Its all about long term averages and the use of getting good value and laying poor value on betfair.

Keep up the good work.... It won't matter that you have released what you are doing because it will be too hard for most people to get the statistics required to be able to follow you.

Good Luck.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 20th January 2007, 11:22 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,366
Default

wesmip1,

You're right, as I stated from the outset, it's not hard and I think just about anyone can do it.

I don't have anything of this from a database, or even my own database.
It's all calculated on spreadsheet.

Please don't take it as me being original, I was just trying to demonstrate that with the right knowledge, tools and research, anyone can do it, providing they are working with "accurate" stuff.

The concept is easy, getting it right is the battle.
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 400,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 30/04/2024
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 16th February 2007, 01:43 AM
newpunter newpunter is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 19
Question A Mathetically proven way to get a good Value bet

Just wondering if anyone has had a go at Automating this system ??

or

would like to have a go !

contact me on newpunter at optusnet dot com dot au

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 16th February 2007, 05:11 AM
crash crash is offline
Suspended.
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
Default

Apparently there is already a lot of betting Bots and various software around that is automated. The problem seems to be reliability.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 16th February 2007, 09:04 AM
newpunter newpunter is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 19
Question

there are a lot of bots out there !! I havent found one that has the ability
to do whats needed for this system

does anyone know of one around ??

or someone who could code it for me at a fair price
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:15 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655