Kenny,

Telling people what they 'meant to say' leads to bad feeling. Asking for clarification is not a hard ask or that difficult is it?. I'm also not interested in punting ability pi..ing competitions in cyberspace either.
If you are trying to stir me up looking for a slanging match by the use of the above personal insult [I've been there, done that with others and I'm just not interested anymore], I will ignore your posts.


Ken char,

My argument has nothing to do with your punting ability, successful or otherwise [I'm sorry for giving you or anyone that impression]. I was talking generally by the use of the word 'you' in my post's argument, not personally. The use of the word 'one' is a bit too straight-laced for me and I've felt uncomfortable when I've used it in the past. My argument was with the logic you presented for making $100 a day. Printing a list of you successful bets does not answer my argument's points or add logic to your original explanation of how to make a $100 a day. It's just a list of results.

Could you please explain the logic of your original post's claims, and/or what specifically do you 'not understand' in my post?

Cheers,
Crash

Crash,

In your post you talk about stopping after one losing bet, this was never mentioned, you talk about basically all bets being evens or odds on, these are YOUR assumptions only, then you go into betting a place, your assumptions and never mentioned.
Then you say the profit is the bit and not the 1 unit plus a bit.

Lets go through a little scenario and see if you can get your head around it.
We start betting for the day and we have 3 loses so we are minus 3 ( do you agree with that )
We then get 2.8 winner so we have had 4 bets less 2.8 so we are now minus 1.2.
We have 2 more losing bets so we are now minus 3.2.
We have a winner at 2.9 so we are now minus1.3.
We have a winner at 2.0 so we are now minus .3
WE have 2 loses so we are now minus 2.3.
We have a winner 3.3 so we are now square.
WE have a lose so we are now minus 1
We have a winner 3.0 so we are now plus 1 stop for the day.

Of the 29 days 14 of them have been a 1 bet day as per today at $4.2
Another 10 days have been 7 bets or less.
The other days have been horrors but only lost on 2 of them.

Hope this explains.

On these bad days what sort of a loss will you go up to before you pull the plug Kenchar?


KV

KV,

I dropped 7.7 yesterday, but a bit of it was my fault, shouldn't have been that bad, I just stuffed up a couple of times.
That's racing.

KC

Kenchar,

Lets get one thing straight. I KNOW you are a good punter. Not just from this forum but from the 'other' one where you have explained your methods in detail. You have nothing to prove with lists of accomplishments. Your original post confused me and I misinterpreted it thats all. Your explanation has clarified your original post. A little bit of further explanation goes a long way. Thank you.

Crash,

Just to clarify one thing, I am not a good punter, in fact I am a very bad punter, but I have one thing and one thing only going for me, and that is discipline, it's as simple as that.
I have often said there are many many very smart people on these forums and in a way I envy them, but I think the reason that the majority are still working is that they lack discipline.
They just love the punt too much.
My perfect life would be 1 bet a day forever.

Cheers

My one bet today [in that comp .too] was Wagga R5/2 Al Kharfra [$3.70] the trainer was that chick from Albury. Forgotten her name. Barbara something? Good little sneaky trainer. I'm happy, had a very nice collect.

A friendly reminder.

It is very easy to misunderstand what someone posts.

It is also very easy to post what you don't mean!

In a conversation this can be immediately cleared up.

So it always pays to politely seek clarification, particularly if you think someone has crossed the line in a negative response to your post.

yes thats 4 sure moderator 3,well by the way do you have a solution to my original question in this post considering your a modertator with lost of archives and knowledge????

regards the rostram

Neil,

There was no need to ask Kenny to clarify his response to my post. It was a blatant personal insult. I thought I handled it well considering. A year ago it would have been a different story..... Blood on the floor:-)