Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 18th April 2011, 07:12 PM
The Ocho The Ocho is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,037
Question Calling any Betting Geniuses

This is probably one of the dumbest things I've ever asked ever but here goes.

I can’t get my brains (or lack of) around this one.

Using Betfair, if a level stakes backing system has lost say $50, would a laying system using the same selections at the same prices therefore make $50?

I thought it would but I’m not sure because you are then losing large amounts when laying but only losing your $1 stake when backing.

Are they simply a mirror image of each other or am I missing something.

I told you it was a dumb question.

Thanks for any help (once you've picked yourself up off the floor ).

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18th April 2011, 07:23 PM
Shaun Shaun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 3,456
Default

It all comes down to strike rates and prices, as you would do with backing to work out if it is profitable do the reverse for laying, but remember the prices you use would be higher on the lay side unless you can lay at that price.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18th April 2011, 07:51 PM
The Elk The Elk is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 28
Default

Mate, I am not a betting genius, but I believe that to take a losing backing system and believe it will be a winning laying system is a little too simplistic.

1. with backing, you work to level stakes ($1 in your example)

2. with laying you work to a set liability - take Michael's laying system (laying SP for $30 liability)

He is laying some horses $100+
So as a backer, you can back 500/1 shot and lose only $1
as a layer your liability is $500 to collect that $1

Your example would probably show a profit laying, but like any system, test it out first with actual selections and look at it from a laying perspective.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18th April 2011, 07:55 PM
stugots stugots is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 879
Default

short answer = no

been there done that Ocho - on average higher prices are required to guarantee lay bets getting matched which results in larger losses when the **************s salute, the opposite is true of win bets & then of course there is the issue of commission on your winnings

to put it another way - I have had some horrible win systems which while they didnt lose once I started laying, it became hardly worthwhile

Last edited by stugots : 18th April 2011 at 08:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18th April 2011, 08:22 PM
Bhagwan Bhagwan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,428
Default

Generally speaking
If one is looking at a failed win only system as a possible laying system , the loss result has to be a min of -30% LOT if using TAB prices to work out past results.

The reason being that one has to assume Betfair prices being 20% greater than TAB prices.
Thus leaving us approx 10% POT.

So when we get bit , we will be trying to recover this & some.

If any one wishes to have a crack at Lay betting ...here's a tip.

Try & target only one selection per venue.e.g. 7 venues = 7 selections.
Bet .6% of bank.
Lay Price 3.50 $9.80
If all are successful = 4.2% increase on bank.

You will find that ones success rate will be a lot higher doing it this way,
Try it for 7 days & look at your results. You may be surprised how good you can be ,doing it this way.

But don't try & kid yourself that you can do it 5 times per venue at all venues, all the time, I wont happen.
__________________
Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18th April 2011, 10:34 PM
The Ocho The Ocho is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,037
Cool

Thanks guys.

So the general consensus is that, if the prices were the same, then the result would be reversed less more commission due to more winning lays than winning back bets (although then I wouldn't be paying larger commissions on the winning back bets). It's all very confusing.

Obviously it wouldn't be possible to have the same prices but if I have a 10% or less back/lay ratio (meaning the lay price is within 10% of the back price) then the results should only be 10% worse (possibly less commission).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 06:24 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655