Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41  
Old 14th April 2013, 03:34 PM
Barny Barny is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,091
Default

Privateer's Pareto thread had Pre-Post odds of $3.50 to $11.00 as the number one criteria in a system that was based around recurring stats in good fields.

DTM
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 15th April 2013, 10:38 AM
beton beton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 589
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Greystoke
Some interesting differences in stats. I wonder if this had anything to do with SOT = GOOD(Melb) vrs DEAD(Syd). In both cases however, a ratings based system trumped the pre-post market, bookies openers and BF SP.

FLEMINGTON
.....W2 W4 W1
PP ..25 38 0
OP ..50 63 38
SP ..63 63 38
RS1 50 88 25
RS2 50 75 50
RS3 38 75 13
RS4 38 75 25
RS5 63 75 25
RS6 75 75 63(5 top pick winners from 8 races)

RANDWICK
.....W2 W4 W1
PP ..78 78 44
OP ..67 78 44
SP ..78 78 33
RS1 78 78 67(6 top pick winners from 9 races)
RS2 33 56 33
RS3 44 56 33
RS4 44 67 11
RS5 44 89 22
RS6 33 56 33

Where;
W4 = % of winners from top 4
W2 = % of winners from top 2
W1 = % of winners from top pick

LG

MY assumption is that in both venues the rating services were the same, raising the issue of track speciality. This is a crucial element in ratings. It is one thing to be good at one state. It is extremely hard to be good at more than one state.
SP is consistent with fav stats. There seems to be an arguement to check the results dutching the top four.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 15th April 2013, 12:27 PM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by beton
There seems to be an arguement to check the results dutching the top four.
FLEMINGTON
...W2 W4 W1 POT
PP 25 38 0 (39)
OP 50 63 38 (26)
SP 63 63 38 (26)
RS1 50 88 25 35
RS2 50 75 50 26
RS3 38 75 13 56
RS4 38 75 25 24
RS5 63 75 25 24
RS6 75 75 63 26

Where POT = % return dutching top 4 via BF SP.

Cheers LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 15th April 2013, 12:41 PM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,237
Default

RANDWICK
......POT
PP (7)
OP (7)
SP (7)
RS1 (7)
RS2 28
RS3 (34)
RS4 66
RS5 53
RS6 (37)

LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 15th April 2013, 12:54 PM
beton beton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 589
Default

Suitable arguement to monitor. Rather than get one overall, find a consistent rating for each state.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:55 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655