Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 22nd August 2011, 10:44 AM
oldtimers oldtimers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 28
Question following the ratings

i have been trialling the unitab ratings where the favourite is well down in the ratings,then backing the 100% plus the next closest. either dutch or level stakes. check brisbane races sat.20/8/11 in particular r2.... does anyone have records for this over a longer period? cheers
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22nd August 2011, 11:39 AM
Try Try Again Try Try Again is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,058
Smile

Hi Oldtimers,

What do you consider "well down in the ratings"?

The favourite in race 2 at Doomben was rated 99 where the winner was rated 95 and the second placed horse rated 100. These were the 3rd and top rated horses. I can't see how you would back the winner based on your "rules".
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22nd August 2011, 01:59 PM
place2win place2win is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtimers
i have been trialling the unitab ratings where the favourite is well down in the ratings,then backing the 100% plus the next closest. either dutch or level stakes. check brisbane races sat.20/8/11 in particular r2.... does anyone have records for this over a longer period? cheers

I Believe, Oldtimers meant the Fav was well down in the field (ie lower half) and was not the 100rater.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13th October 2011, 11:12 PM
The Ocho The Ocho is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,037
Default

I thought I'd continue this thread rather than start a new one.

Does anyone know/have records of the Unitab 100 rater? Basically the strike rate but more importantly the profit/loss for an extended period of time whether it be backing or laying. Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14th October 2011, 04:10 AM
Bhagwan Bhagwan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,428
Default

The 100ptrs
If also one of RadioTAB selections

1st 33%SR -15% LOT

2nd 25%SR -13% LOT

3rd 20%SR -17% LOT

Average if in top 3 selections 25%SR -15% LOT

UniTAB prices.

So if using Betfair prices, for an approx 15% greater, which is accounting for commission.
One should approx break even if using Betfair.

That's not a bad starting point, just eliminate 1 selection from 8 races & your in profit by approx +12.5% POT.
Using Betfair prices.
Or
Successfully lay 1 in 8 races & your miles in front.

Apparently I was reading somewhere that Backing all the 100ptr $20+ shots, shows a profit.
__________________
Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14th October 2011, 04:13 AM
Bhagwan Bhagwan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,428
Default

That sample is based on 50,000 races.
__________________
Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14th October 2011, 04:31 AM
Bhagwan Bhagwan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,428
Default

Hi Oldtimers,

When you say Dutch the selection, I am assuming you are targeting 2+ runners.

Is that right?

If so which 2 do you take.
__________________
Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 14th October 2011, 07:41 AM
The Ocho The Ocho is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,037
Default

Thanks very much Bhagwan. Those strike rates are virtually like the 1st, 2nd and 3rd favs straight out selections or have I got those wrong?

You (or someone else) don't happen to have just the 100 rater stats and profit/loss by themselves (without the radiotab picks) by any chance?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 14th October 2011, 08:51 AM
ixlat0 ixlat0 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 45
Default

UNITab Top 100

random sample (oct 2010 - sept 2011) each month represented (min 10 races/mth) -- did not include race if 100 scratched (ie didn't take the next best) or more than 1 in race -- used UNITab prices

N = 151
SR 22.5% (expect long term ~SR23.5%)
AR $3.6 (expect long term ~AR$3.82)
POT -19% (expect long term POT~ -10.2%)

variance -- for every 150 races -- 95% of the time i would expect a SR between 17% - 30%

with an AR of ~$3.8 you would need SR26.5% to break even

have the best day!
__________________
never smile at a crocodile -- don't be taken in by his welcome grin
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 14th October 2011, 11:20 AM
beton beton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 589
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ixlat0
UNITab Top 100

random sample (oct 2010 - sept 2011) each month represented (min 10 races/mth) -- did not include race if 100 scratched (ie didn't take the next best) or more than 1 in race -- used UNITab prices

N = 151
SR 22.5% (expect long term ~SR23.5%)
AR $3.6 (expect long term ~AR$3.82)
POT -19% (expect long term POT~ -10.2%)

variance -- for every 150 races -- 95% of the time i would expect a SR between 17% - 30%

with an AR of ~$3.8 you would need SR26.5% to break even


have the best day!



At $3.60 the SR for the top fav is 26.17% on a 43000 sample. Beton
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:46 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655