It was Bhagwan. Who else?

LG

__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB

Rails.

You certainly are not sticking your nose in, infact I am pleased you did. I was getting the impression that Moeee, Rails Run and myself may all be on different trams.

I agree because dog races are over so quick that last monies in take time to calculate and because afair quantity ofn the total pool is placed in the last minutes creates a jam.

Having said that I am having difficulty seeing how the pools can be maipulated by putting money on early or late. It all comes out in the wash anyway. Unless they are trying to fool the market and uneducated money, a sort of Johnathon Thurston or Joey " Show and Go" play blindsiding the public.

In greyhounds I do not think their is to much uneducated money that follow other punters leads, if their is , more the fool them.

I would be interested to know how early money can affect the final dividends.


Star

ps

I have edited that post because I thought it was LG but I see it was from Rails Run. Please read in that context.

Introductory Geophysical Inverse Theory as mentioned by woof43...
http://mesoscopic.mines.edu/~jscales/gp605/snapshot.pdf

__________________
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

CM Too busy now but that looks like the lightest bit of heavy reading that I will have done for a while.

Missed this one.

No not greatly D.D say about 2 full betting points,
In the old either way.

At the most say A.A.P. $3.0 me say $5.0-$6.0.
The other way me $8.0 A.A.P $4.0-$4.5.

This is A.A.P. F.F.5 and there prices me then.
Re rating them.

I never get say A.A.P. $3.0 me $21.0 or visa-versa.

If i did i would use another set of ratings the market then,
Becomes the final decision.

What i did find is this A.A.P $4.0 me $5.5 Don Scott $101.0,
And they are both Weight ratings i tend to think the bonuses,
And penalties for Don Scott is outdated

I used to ignore his prices and just look at the top 3-4-5,
And ignore what odds they were that's a long time ago now though.

They may have improved a lot since then.

Cheers.
Gary.

I tend to stick with the old ratings that I,m used to ala Don Scott/inracing/Warren Block - usually based around WT Ratings but I,m old Fashioned but my hats off to to those who think there,s a better way and I encourage that.But I,m a old man and I hesitate to change anything thats made me a substaniatle profit for over 40 years.
Horses for courses I guess.
Cheers
darky

Good Luck with that then D/D.


Cheers.
Garyf.