Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11th October 2005, 01:41 PM
Oaksnaf Oaksnaf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 450
Default

Also Hamilton 2) #3
__________________
GO VOUVRAY
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11th October 2005, 01:52 PM
Oaksnaf Oaksnaf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 450
Default

Well what i have been noticing. It is *very* early days, only 21 selections. But i have not had a winner which has been in a field of less than 10 starters.

Ill keep a record of it to see if this trend continues in the next 100 starters.
__________________
GO VOUVRAY
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11th October 2005, 02:16 PM
Dale Dale is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Bundy
Posts: 292
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oaksnaf

Hamilton:

Race 5) #7




I notice it has 2 spells in its last 4 starts,i always keep my eye out for these horses,i put them in the fun catagory and have a little bet on em,you get some nice priced winners.

The theory is that the trainer thinks he has a good horse and is taking it along slowly waiting for it to reach maturity.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11th October 2005, 02:21 PM
Oaksnaf Oaksnaf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 450
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale
I notice it has 2 spells in its last 4 starts,i always keep my eye out for these horses,i put them in the fun catagory and have a little bet on em,you get some nice priced winners.

The theory is that the trainer thinks he has a good horse and is taking it along slowly waiting for it to reach maturity.

Well we will find out in little over an hour wont we. Hehe. But there are less than 10 runners in this event, and so far, not one winner has come from a field smaller than 10. But there is always time for a first, and hope today is that day.
__________________
GO VOUVRAY
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11th October 2005, 02:32 PM
Sportz Sportz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,066
Default

Okay, I just noticed this thread.

I actually had a bit of fun a few years back following sole first-uppers in fields of 12 or more and particularly in races of 1300m+.

By the way, on a similar note, you could also take a look at sole first starters. By that I mean, the only horse in the race which is having it's first career start. Again fields of 12 or more and concentrate on maidens.

Don't think it's any holy grail or anything, but it's not bad for a bit of fun or perhaps include these horses in multis.

Last edited by Sportz : 11th October 2005 at 02:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11th October 2005, 02:58 PM
punter57 punter57 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 130
Default

Dale, I don't think your reasoning is correct (post 14) with regard to this horse in Hamilton R5. It looks like it was injured or something last time in. To accept the risk of betting on it (Deneuve) the price would have to be much longer AND the trainer would have to be displaying much more confidence than is the case today. Only half an hour to go.
PS. What's your E-Mail Dale? Gothehalalau or something like that? Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11th October 2005, 08:47 PM
Dale Dale is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Bundy
Posts: 292
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by punter57
Dale, I don't think your reasoning is correct (post 14) with regard to this horse in Hamilton R5. It looks like it was injured or something last time in. To accept the risk of betting on it (Deneuve) the price would have to be much longer AND the trainer would have to be displaying much more confidence than is the case today. Only half an hour to go.
PS. What's your E-Mail Dale? Gothehalalau or something like that? Cheers.



Yep well spotted 57,thats the trouble with those horses but sometimes my throery holds up,if like you say the odds outway the risk then its worth a punt.

Yeah my email is something like that,it should be gothehalatau not gothehalalau

Can i expect a love letter sometime soon lol.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11th October 2005, 11:05 PM
Bhagwan Bhagwan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,428
Default

I did some research on resumers once & it produced a profit when targeting 1400m races for resumers , I found that strange because the stats say the percentage to starters is greater in 1200m races & less .

One wont get many bets.

Maybe there is a good reason why most trainers do not place their horses in the 1201+m range race .
__________________
Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12th October 2005, 09:48 AM
w924 w924 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 256
Thumbs up Hi Bhagwan

Interesting post bhagwan...kinda flies in the face of what i assumed. That's good. Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12th October 2005, 10:27 AM
Sportz Sportz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,066
Default

Yep. That's what I found just looking at results over the years. As I said, races of 1300m+ and preferably 1400m+.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:02 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655