Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 20th February 2006, 10:54 AM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Red face

Almost a complete wipeout yesterday. From the eight selections there was one winner paying $2.80, and three placegetters paying $4.70. Hopefully its just a temporary glitch and not its death knell.

To date there have been 24 selections for 12 winners for a 35% POT, and 19 placegetters for a 8% POT.

Three selections today:
Dubbo r8 no.2 - Kelly Road.
Swan Hill R3 no.5 - Pay Day
Kempsey R1 no.8 - The Spinster.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 20th February 2006, 08:12 PM
kiwi kiwi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: new zealand
Posts: 834
Thumbs up

Great comeback today Michael, hope you got plenty.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 20th February 2006, 10:46 PM
Papyrus Papyrus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 28
Default

Does anyone have any inside info why neurals hasn't got Wedensday up,
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 20th February 2006, 11:01 PM
wesmip1 wesmip1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,601
Default

They usually put them up as they get the fields confirmed. Sometimes they are late. Usually you won't get them all up till the day before.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 21st February 2006, 08:04 AM
Spazattack
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy Neuralmania

Michael, any clue as to what went wrong on Sunday?

Been doing so well, back on track again yesterday.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 21st February 2006, 10:10 AM
KennyVictor KennyVictor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Mt Tamborine
Posts: 574
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spazattack
Anyone got any idea what's wrong with this website. We constantly hear of the millions our benevolent benefators have spent on the software to keep us chatting but smiles come out like web page addresses, I don't have permission to access my own details, etc. Don't their suppliers have software support or have they actually downloaded the software via crakazoid.

KV
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 21st February 2006, 11:06 AM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Red face

Hi, Spazattack. I double-checked the selections, and they were all genuine. I didn't listen to the races so I don't know if bad luck had anything to so with it. Maybe the law of averages ruled after having such a good run.

The neural site is now working properly, it wasn't earlier today. I'm using my AOL browser.

Yesterday the three selections won paying $5.30 for the win and $3.40 for the place. Very disappointing divvies. Two were $3.20 and $4.00 pre-post yet paid odds-on.

TO date there have been 27 selections for 15 winners providing a 34% POT and 21 placegetters for a 8% POT.

Three selections today:
Cessnock R3 no.1 - Montecito
Wangaratta R2 no.7 - Poiter
Townsville R6 no.1 - Ruhlmann.

Last edited by michaelg : 21st February 2006 at 11:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 22nd February 2006, 11:34 AM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Red face

One winner from yesterday's three selections paying $4.50, and two placegetters paying $3.10.

Seven selections today:
Hawkesbury R5 no.10 - Yalaad
Launceston R2 no.3 - At St Georges
Launceston R3 no.3 - Dusky Edition
Launceston R10 no.1 - Lost Range
Murray Bridge R1 no.13 - Mytilini Miss
Murray Bridge R3 no.1 - Hurricane Gaze
Geraldton R6 no.2 - Solar Impact.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 22nd February 2006, 01:18 PM
Spazattack
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Michael, when I asked if you had a clue as to why Sunday's results were not up to par, I should have prompted a little more.

I have found with the neurals, some states are definitely better/worse performers than others.

You may be using much more than the basic neurals in your decision making, don't know.

However, from experience, Victoria and New South Wales seem to be the most accurate , southern Queensland, South Australia and WA adequate , but Tasmania and north Queensland present real risks .

You may find exactly the opposite.

You might like to look at your overall impressive results, on a state by state basis. See if anything stands out. Also, distance of winning/losing races may point to an improved strike rate.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 23rd February 2006, 11:36 AM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Red face

Hi, Spazattack.

I remember testing a neural system some time ago and races under 1,200 metres did not perform well, so with your prompting I looked at these races for this system. Since listing the selections here on Sunday 12 Feb there have been 11 selections for a return of $11.90 on win betting but only $9.40 for the place. So from today I'll delete these races. I also looked at different states but there does not seem to be any advandage or disadvantage. If you have any more suggestions please let me know so I can check them.

Four selections today:
Canterbury R4 no.2 - Gentille
Queanbeyan R1 no.1 - Chezmay
Mackay R5 no.3 - Pilliga
Albany R5 no.2 - Casual Wolf
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:51 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655