Thanks Merriguy. It's funny, I missed all but the last two which both lost but scared the hell out of me losing in photo's. It is very much in a trial phase so no great sums of cash at this stage.

__________________
All generalizations are dangerous.

Mt Barker
R6 N1 LE JEUNE Lost @ 3.40

This was a ludicrous price for a horse that had only won once and placed twice in 16 attempts! Throw in the jockey with deplorable strike-rate and other horses with better API and you have yourselves a laying opportunity!

There were a few more I laid today that fit the criteria as I had more time to watch the markets. I might start using 3.50 as the cut-off point in the pre post markets, just to get some more action.

13 Selections: 92% losers @ 4.36

__________________
All generalizations are dangerous.

Well done. The method has logic, no reason why it won't continue.

Thanks Michaelg. I'm just looking for an edge, and it might come from the system rules as they are often stats that are completely overlooked.

__________________
All generalizations are dangerous.

Pakenham
R9 N1 ELMORE

Surprisingly not much action. Might post more later if the early fixed markets come up for other meetings other than Morphettville.

__________________
All generalizations are dangerous.

12th March Moonee Valley R4 N6 FEARLESS WATERS

__________________
All generalizations are dangerous.

Moonee Valley R4 N6 FEARLESS WATERS Lost @ 5.70
Pakenham R9 N1 ELMORE Lost @ 3.65

__________________
All generalizations are dangerous.

Port Macquarie
R6 N1 MISTAMAN
R6 N4 OUR JAASI
R8 N1 WANT A BET

As you can see there are 2 selections in one race, which has not come up before. Either lay both or just the shortest priced one. Maybe Mistaman, as it is barrier 10 in a 1000m race. Tricky. Any thoughts??

__________________
All generalizations are dangerous.

definately lay both, reduced loss if an accident does happens

That's what i'll do, thanks stugots, unless the price blows out on one or both.

__________________
All generalizations are dangerous.