I'm forever fiddling with mine...my sytem that is...lol...but here's the stats on my newly refined system.

Bet for the win
24.2% strike rate
$10.76 ave price per winner
160.5% pot
longest losing streak = 13

44.8% strike rate
$2.66 ave price per place
19.4% pot
longest losing streak = 6

Unfortunately, I average only 3 to 4 bets per week, so technically my system doesn't meet your guidelines of 5 minimum. It's not how big it is, but what you do with it that really counts though right...lol.

I have only been collecting data for my system since 10/2006, so I've only got 223 selections thus far, and unfortunately I haven't been betting this version of my system the whole time, since I recently discovered a couple of great new filters.

__________________
...time held me green and dying, though I sang in my chains like the sea. - Dylan Thomas

That should read Gold and Platinum!

Crikey mate I can tell you never leave yours alone.....it's freakin' HUGE!!!!

Serously impressive set of figures there and it really does make me want to get back to that drawing board and keep on thinking outside my silly little square. It's been so long since I came up with a radically different system that I was starting to think maybe I'd tried it all already. Not many bets per week, sure, but who cares with a return like that?

Thanks a million for spurring me on.

__________________
"Not winning on a horse that came first is one thing.....Losing on a horse that didn't come first is something else entirely!!!"

Heres one that has a 90% place SR

Chasing the 300+ Ptr in the Neurals set on Std Factory settings .

Bet 1 unit a win Lay & Bet 2 units for it to run a place.

Using Betfair.

They very rarely win, but they get placed a lot for some reason .

About 10-12 bets a week.

Cheers.

__________________
Cheers.

Well, with some of THOSE monsters, I'd better stand and pee in the corner! mine too finds 10-12 bets a week and I have steadily increased stakes, but I guess it's all about having the "B A L L S" to "plonk' it on ey?

Hey partypooper,

Just looking at the results that you have put up, it comes out as exactly the same results as a place system I have been trialling. Out of curiosity, did a member off these forums pass it on to you? I havent actually started betting it yet, just building up a good size starting bank at present.

G'Day Thorns, no this particular one is all mine, though some of the filters are well tried. I have passed my thoughts onto other members via e-mail, but that is usually not about the initial selection process. The only other things I could say though is that BEST tote is essential.

Gee LOOK ...everyone is measuring themselves!

Mine is only pixie sized

__________________
Pixie

"It's worth remembering that profit isn't profit until it's spent off the racecourse." -- Crash

You know what they say about Pygmies! Hell, I once saw a David Attenborough thingy on Pygmies and he made a point of how big their Strike Rates were.

No kidding, impressive set of figures on those fellas!!!

__________________
"Not winning on a horse that came first is one thing.....Losing on a horse that didn't come first is something else entirely!!!"

In my experience it's the ones that brag that seem to use the cubicles and buy big cars!
but talking of "horses" what would you reckon to this win system, a particular genuine run: 9 losers followed by a 2-1 winner then 7 losers folowed by a 1-1 winner? any comments appreciated.