Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12th June 2011, 07:26 PM
Shaun Shaun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 3,456
Default

In the past i have done my own ratings and find it a challenge to beat them and price runners well under there price, i have moved on to other areas but still think my ratings can make money, take any race from today over a rating of 70 and i can give you a run down.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12th June 2011, 08:25 PM
Neil Neil is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 804
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by marksto2
The bookmakers do the ratings and there opening prices should be the most accurate market to a the runners chances. If you just adjust the prices % to under 100% and bet the overlays then you have the answer.

So why bother with ratings? The bookies such as IAS keep those horses well under the odds that they know are likely to win. They employ people to rate and ensure the most accurate prices are put up.

Why bother doing ratings when all ratings are identical?

Why bother doing ratings when all ratings have the same horses in the same rated order?

Why bother doing ratings when all ratings that give dollar odds price assessments have the same horses in the same rated order with the same dollar odds price assessments?

Need I say more?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12th June 2011, 09:29 PM
axledog axledog is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 160
Default

ask moeee , he knows everything!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12th June 2011, 09:59 PM
gunny72 gunny72 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 147
Default No more to say

Spot on Neil. I believe that overall bookies and punters get the prices right for a race (it has been shown that horses win in proportion to their starting price). It is pointless following the same selections as everyone else, and most rating methods end up with very similar odds as has been pointed out here.

But remember too, a horse's rating price is just a measure of its chance of winning a race. A top rated horse with a rating of $3 say, in a market framed to 100% (in practice this most likely would be put up by the bookies as $2.50) indicates the horse has a 1 in 3 (33%) chance of winning, however, there is a 2 in 3 (67%) chance of the winner coming from one of the other horses.

The real skill in punting is to find the winner from the other 67% that most other punters overlook and where TAB overlays appear.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12th June 2011, 10:09 PM
moeee moeee is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axledog
ask moeee , he knows everything!


No , Not EVERYTHING!!!
But what I do know , I'm prepared to share.

A Professional Gambler wrote this about the LOSING PUNTERS

"His attitude toward turf speculation can best be summed up as "fun and games." He often resents any suggestion which deprives him of making the 101 blunders common to many turf enthusiasts"


I enjoy Rating Greyhounds.
I do not make Profit in my Wagering , but have not lost for over 3 or so years now.
I manage to beat the 15% takeout , and that is all at the minute.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 13th June 2011, 12:13 AM
axledog axledog is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 160
Default

No , Not EVERYTHING!!!
But what I do know , I'm prepared to share.

A Professional Gambler wrote this about the LOSING PUNTERS

"His attitude toward turf speculation can best be summed up as "fun and games." He often resents any suggestion which deprives him of making the 101 blunders common to many turf enthusiasts"


I enjoy Rating Greyhounds.
Quote:
I do not make Profit in my Wagering , but have not lost for over 3 or so years now.
I manage to beat the 15% takeout , and that is all at the minute.
Really? Am i missing the point in all this?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 13th June 2011, 05:13 AM
Bhagwan Bhagwan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,428
Default

Ozracetools have a handy program for resetting the book percentage.

So
Punch in all the Bookies prices which will come to approx 115-130% on opening prices
Then make the program set it to your percentage, say 100%

This 100% tries to reflect the horse's true chance of winning, if the bookies prices are accurate

Then maybe use Betfair to get the overs for win betting .

Now if we find ourselves getting bit, profit wise, along the way, it tells us that the general public is more accurate at accessing the markets chance of winning.

In that case , one maybe better off going for the unders.
e.g. Adjusted Bookies accessed price $4.50 then only bet it if its under this price on Betfair.

That's the general idea .

One will usually find that it swings from unders one day to overs getting up the next day, so one has to try & view these things over a number of days to see which is the more profitable.

The late great Don Scott did extremely well at doing his own ratings & betting the overs.
He would bet his ratings to price set to a to a fixed return.
E.g. His accessed price say $3.50 into his Return figure of say $1000
O/L $286
The horse he is targeting could actually be 7.00 with the Bookmakers.
7.00 x Bet $286 = Ret $2002

He would usually bet between 2-5 runners a race.
__________________
Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 13th June 2011, 08:25 AM
moeee moeee is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axledog
Really? Am i missing the point in all this?


I guess you are.
There are a few there.

Honesty, Humility,Acceptance to start with.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 13th June 2011, 11:44 AM
AngryPixie AngryPixie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhagwan
The late great Don Scott did extremely well at doing his own ratings & betting the overs.
Bhagwan

I fear things have changed significantly since Don Scott's heyday. The ease of access to information; fast, cheap computing; and, the globalisation of betting markets makes for a very different climate. The big over's of the past are now long, long gone.

Time for the new paradigm. Tell me first when you find it
__________________
Pixie
"It's worth remembering that profit isn't profit until it's spent off the racecourse." -- Crash
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 13th June 2011, 12:13 PM
jose jose is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: brisbane
Posts: 419
Wink

Just be a bit wary of using unofficial opening prices.
Things may have changed, but, when MR was in charge of IAS the prices on the website and the price that they were prepared to bet you for any substantial amount were 2 very different things.
__________________
Jose'.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 06:25 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655