Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 21st March 2005, 08:47 PM
Duritz Duritz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 956
Default

Obviousy with that maths stuff up by me there I musta bod when I should have mas, or vice versa, or something.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 21st March 2005, 08:51 PM
Duritz Duritz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 956
Default

Yeah my problem was I raised the whole thing to the power of two, when I shoulda raised the last bit to the power of two then multiplied that last answer by the 0.21 at the start.

So, I actually did Mas when I should've Bod.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 21st March 2005, 09:47 PM
marcus25 marcus25 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duritz
Yeah my problem was I raised the whole thing to the power of two, when I shoulda raised the last bit to the power of two then multiplied that last answer by the 0.21 at the start.

So, I actually did Mas when I should've Bod.

Hi Duritz!
It's especially embarrassing when we know how good you are with parentheses!? LOL.
Missing the fact that only the last bit was to be raised!
Tsk, tsk. Where is the world coming to?
Cheers mate as long you are winning that's what matters!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 21st March 2005, 09:59 PM
kenchar kenchar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 723
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duritz
Yeah my problem was I raised the whole thing to the power of two, when I shoulda raised the last bit to the power of two then multiplied that last answer by the 0.21 at the start.

So, I actually did Mas when I should've Bod.


Duritz,
The last time I tried to raise the thing to the power of two I found I wasn't up to it so I did Bod by himself and Mas really got upset.

Sorry mate couldn't help myself ( ************ chardonny again ).
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 21st March 2005, 10:06 PM
Duritz Duritz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 956
Default

ROFL brilliant stuff, sexual innuendo in maths!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 22nd March 2005, 02:01 PM
partypooper partypooper is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,389
Default

Duritz, I feel like a wilting violet amongst all this grey matter, but if I can put in my 2c worth in (laymans terms), I've hit the holy grail (thinks) several times, some involving thousands of bets and the POT always hovering, until inexplicably an exceptionally bad run is encountered, which of course I tried to ride out,... "confident" that the roundabouts were imminent,...... unfortunately on several occasions they never arrived. Although the same plan from then on continued to make a profit, but not enough to absorb the losses.

At the moment I too have 3 plans on the go (one for more than 2 years) all well in the black, but because of previous experience am still not game to call any the "Grail"

What it has done; is planted a seed ,that what is needed is to make a killing when all goes well and ride out the bad times when it doesn't, and if AFTER all that there is still a profit,.... we have done well!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 22nd March 2005, 03:11 PM
Duritz Duritz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 956
Default

Thankyou, PartyPooper, I am now firmly back down on earth, miserably waiting for my system to fail.

I'll just go prepare the noose now too.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 22nd March 2005, 03:30 PM
Duritz Duritz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 956
Default

Hey from the point of view of stats, what do you all think of this system's results? This is one I was testing simultaneously with the other one. Again, about a year worth of results, these are the stats.

Selections - 2500
Winners - 581
S/R - 23%
Collects - 2490
Pot or Lot - 0%


THAT is on SP. SO, using other methods, that could become a POT pretty easy. Is 2500 a good sample size?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 22nd March 2005, 03:52 PM
Top Rank Top Rank is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 205
Unhappy

Partpooper are you saying that you had a system that showed profit after 2-3 thousand bets and then still had a bad enough run to send it spiralling into negative.

I don't want to think about it.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 22nd March 2005, 09:33 PM
partypooper partypooper is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,389
Default

Top Rank, no not quite, but it devastated several "banks" and decicrated (spelling?) ALL confidence, although I have since re-commenced the basic idea but with safety measures, but still proceed with caution. When youre place betting showing around 4-5% POT (overall) as duritzt rightly says you can isolate any group of 2,3 ,4 or5 hundred bets and show vastly different figures.

Duritz.

Sorry mate I wasn't trying to be a "partypooper" I was only telling "my" story, you may well have the Goose firmly in your grasp, good luck!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:33 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655