Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 7th June 2002, 10:41 PM
Fryingpan Fryingpan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 154
Default

Daniel from The Punter's Notebook generously gave me these stats about first and second favourites performance in relation to their last start. Worth a read.


Saturday Metropolitan Favourites - by last start finish position (last 38
months)

Last start
1st - 33.5% strike rate: LOT = -10.6%
2nd - 29.8% strike rate: LOT = -12.6%
3rd - 28.4% strike rate: LOT -10.7%
4th - 27.1% strike rate: LOT -15.7%
5th - 27.1% strike rate: LOT -12.9%
6th - 29.4% strike rate: LOT -2.6%
7th - 23.9% strike rate: LOT -21.1%
8th - 27.1% strike rate: LOT -4.3%
Worse than 8th - 26.9% strike rate: LOT -12.3%

Saturday Metropolitan 2nd Favourites - by last start finish position
(March
99 - April 02)

1st - 19.1% strike rate: LOT = -12.9%
2nd - 21.4% strike rate: POT = +0.1%
3rd - 18.4% strike rate: LOT -12.8%
4th - 17.3% strike rate: LOT -17.9%
5th - 19.6% strike rate: LOT -1.6%
6th - 16.3% strike rate: LOT -19.4%
7th - 20.3% strike rate: LOT -8.8%
8th - 16.2% strike rate: LOT -22.2%
Worse than 8th - 19.9% strike rate: POT +1.7%
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 8th June 2002, 10:06 AM
becareful becareful is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Canberra
Posts: 730
Default

Conclusion - last start finish position is not a good indicator of winning chances and don't bet on first or second favourite in a race :smile:
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 8th June 2002, 10:22 AM
Privateer Privateer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 230
Default

I disagree. Last start finish position is one of the top 6 indicators of the chances of a horse. Of course, knowing the other 5 and linking them together to make selections is helpful.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 8th June 2002, 10:34 AM
becareful becareful is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Canberra
Posts: 730
Default

Oops - meant to say that BY ITSELF last start position is not a good indicator. I certainly consider it but I do not have rules like "must finish in first 3 at last start".

I stand by the not betting on first/second favourite as a general rule (with only very rare exceptions) - much easier to find good value in the $8-$20 range (for win betting anyway).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 8th June 2002, 10:35 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'd reckon that more than 50% of winners finished 1st or 2nd last start (metro sat races only).

This stat includes horses that are not fav or 2nd fav. So you have to consider horses outside the top 2 in the market.


Agree with Privateer - YOU CAN'T TAKE ONE STAT BY ITSELF AND EXPECT TO WIN.

IF YOU TOOK ONE STAT WITH ANYTHING IT WOULDN'T WORK.

What if you bought a house, purely because the street no was 56, because the last 10 hourses numbered 56 had increased in value by 50% in two years. It wouldn't work.

When you buy a car you look at more than its colour don't you????

When you choose a wife, you look at more than her eye colour don't you???

To be successful on the punt, you need to look at a range of things and put them all together.

Also, a single stat like that will change over time - the profitable stats may start to lose over the next 12 mths and vice versa.

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 8th June 2002, 11:17 AM
Privateer Privateer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 230
Default

I don't know about the eye colour analogy...my wife DOES have pretty eyes!! LOL
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 8th June 2002, 11:22 AM
becareful becareful is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Canberra
Posts: 730
Default

And I bought my car because it was a red convertible :grin:
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 8th June 2002, 01:53 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What if it had no engine?

Should also check the car too!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 8th June 2002, 01:53 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What if it had no engine?

Should also check the car too!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 8th June 2002, 04:48 PM
becareful becareful is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Canberra
Posts: 730
Default

Well when I got her she had quite a few k's on the clock and had been round the block a few times but she still has a great body and handles well. Nothing like going for a ride in her on a Saturday afternoon to put a smile on my face :smile:

Oh and the car's not to bad either!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:33 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655