 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
#31
24th April 2005, 07:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I don't understand why you praise the efforts of the professionals,then go against the weight of money! But like they say,"it's your money Ralph". 
|
|
#32
24th April 2005, 08:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
moeee,
You should know by now I go by my own ratings/judgement. Often the pro money agrees with me. If you chop and change it is a recipe for failure. And the pro money is not always right - just look at the Brisbane/west Coast match today. Brisbane $2.00 into $1.75 favourites at the kick off. All Isaid was the professionals (including me ) had a good lick at West Coast and Melbourne prior to the season commencing. November in fact. Last edited by Rock Steady : 24th April 2005 at 08:04 PM.
|
|
#33
24th April 2005, 08:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Oh when the saints go marchi'in,oh when the saints go marchin'in oh i went and took the 40+,when the saints go marchin'in oh i do like that number should have taken 60,when the saints go marchin ínnnnn!!!!1
|
|
#34
24th April 2005, 08:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
You're kidding! Damn, I bet too early.
|
|
#35
24th April 2005, 08:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes Sportz,
WCE got out to $2.08 with Pinnacle and a general $2.00 in most other places. Just proves that the money isn't always right. I took $1.91 early in the week Collingwood and buttered up at $2.25. All the money is for Essendon but that doesn't make them win.
|
|
#37
25th April 2005, 04:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well done Mug Punta. Bombers too good.
Loss of $2000 for me on Collingwood.
|
|
#38
25th April 2005, 05:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just curious RS.
I know you have your interstate rule, but do you think that maybe it's worth a bet on WCE when you have them rated so short compared to what there actual price is. I know you are always looking for value,and I think you are a good enough judge to know when to have a dip or stay out.
|
|
#39
25th April 2005, 07:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Interesting point Mugs. In my heart I liked WEST COAST and my model rated them very short but I have rules for a reason: to take the indecision out of the equation. That was a game that was not indecisive but a lot of interstate clashes are and so I have just learnt over the years that it is better to have a set rule. If I had backed all the interstate "value 'plays over many years I would be worse off than I am now.
|
|
#40
25th April 2005, 10:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Pity I used the word "would" instead of "did".........
|
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
