Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Archive > AFL Australian Rules Football Forum
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 18th May 2005, 10:42 AM
mug punta mug punta is offline
Former Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 388
Default

Sportz, I reckon WCE 1-39 is a great bet this round. I reckon they are just floating a bit at the moment. I cant see 'em smashing the Pies but they should have enough class to still win.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 18th May 2005, 10:47 AM
Sportz Sportz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,067
Default

I hope you're right. The lines aren't up just yet, but I'm thinking Collingwood will get around 39.5 start.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 18th May 2005, 11:37 AM
Macca Macca is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moeee
I spend ages sorting out the probabilities for negative reward.
I am considering a new idea in punting,where you pick out games that could be closish and then backing the roughie.

Perhaps you should stick with just one method and actually see it through to either boom or bust. Chopping and changing from one sport to another and one method to another is a one way ticket to the poor house.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 18th May 2005, 02:33 PM
mug punta mug punta is offline
Former Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sportz
I hope you're right. The lines aren't up just yet, but I'm thinking Collingwood will get around 39.5 start.



I could be wrong but I reckon you will only get around 26-28 points start.

Just had a look at my bookie Pies +30.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 18th May 2005, 02:38 PM
Sportz Sportz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,067
Red face

Ooops sorry, my mistake. I actually meant 29.5 points. I'd really prefer 39.5 though.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 19th May 2005, 04:21 PM
moeee moeee is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sportz
Hang on, Essendon aren't playing at home.

No Sportz.I'm not saying they qualify under the homedog system,but they qualify under the "how the effin' 'ell did they win system"
No logical reason why the homedog system should work,yet it does!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 19th May 2005, 04:25 PM
moeee moeee is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mug punta
Mo,
And if you think emotion isnt one of the most critical components for big games look what the Dons did last week for Sheedy's jubilee match against a full strength Dockers team.

Hang on Mugs!
I'm sure it was you who suggested that emotion was overrated.
Apologies if it weren't you.
Regardless,your money would be much safer in the bank than on Carlton.Cameron Bruce is back.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 19th May 2005, 04:29 PM
moeee moeee is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macca
Perhaps you should stick with just one method and actually see it through to either boom or bust. Chopping and changing from one sport to another and one method to another is a one way ticket to the poor house.

Thanks for your input Macca.
You being a newbie wouldn't realize that I only bet AFL and have been doing so for almost 15 years.
There is something else sinister happening that is destroying my methods!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 19th May 2005, 04:34 PM
rabbitz rabbitz is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: sharapova island
Posts: 1,843
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by moeee
Thanks for your input Macca.
You being a newbie wouldn't realize that I only bet AFL and have been doing so for almost 15 years.
There is something else sinister happening that is destroying my methods!


What Moeee what,Im all aquiver.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 19th May 2005, 04:46 PM
moeee moeee is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rabbitz
What Moeee what,Im all aquiver.

Well if I knew I wouldn't be concerned,but whatever it is,it seems to be affecting you and Chuck as well.
My only thoughts at the minute have links with the hole in the ozone layer and the missing Weapons of Mass Destruction!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 06:05 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655