Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 7th June 2012, 11:04 PM
axledog axledog is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 160
Default

Hi TTA and Matt ,


Any thing come of this?
My new system under way now (3 weeks only - 13 selections for 6 wins
but no value.....)

Still lookin , getting closer , but need price.

And you ?
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 8th June 2012, 09:04 AM
gunny72 gunny72 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 147
Default

Last start winner
Top ranked place percent
Career Starts >= 15
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 8th June 2012, 10:18 AM
Try Try Again Try Try Again is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,057
Smile

Hi Axledog,

I have revisited my system a few weeks ago after I read about looking at starters without a lot of career runs.

Formally I looked at horses with 7 to 29 career starts but I now only look at horses with <20 career starts, that are also last start winners and with a few other rules, one being prepost price is <$10. This has increased the POT% considerably.

Keep working at it I'm sure you will strike it lucky soon!
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 8th June 2012, 11:12 AM
moeee moeee is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
Default

You have been TOUd. Please stick to discussing the betting system and not flaming/baiting forum members. Thank you. Moderator.

Last edited by Moderator 3 : 8th June 2012 at 12:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 9th June 2012, 09:27 AM
gunny72 gunny72 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 147
Default

The stats show that the average strike rate of horses decreases as number of career starts increases but I am not sure how to interpret this. Should we be giving horses with fewer starts a greater rating or should we be compensating horses that have had a lot of starts?
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 9th June 2012, 10:30 AM
beton beton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 589
Default

There is no reason why the Peter Principle can not be applied to horses. They just go up in class until they become mediocre.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 9th June 2012, 10:48 AM
moeee moeee is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moeee
You have been TOUd. Please stick to discussing the betting system and not flaming/baiting forum members. Thank you. Moderator.

Is there any danger as to posting who the members responsible for issuing the TOU in the future?
Is that a problem?
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 9th June 2012, 11:28 AM
Try Try Again Try Try Again is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,057
Smile

Hi Axledog,

I look at the following rules for last start winners

  1. Career starts
  2. Unitab Rating
  3. Win%
  4. Days since last started (DSLS)
  5. Prepost price
I only bet on Good or Dead tracks on Saturday Metropolitan meetings in SA,VIC, NSW & Qld.

As I previously indicated I changed how I was applying my rules and since 19th May there has been 26 bets for 7 winners (27% S/R) and an increase in bank of 32.4 units on an outlay of 45 units = POT% of 72%

The gold is out there - we just have to find it!
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 9th June 2012, 12:59 PM
mattio mattio is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axledog
Hi TTA and Matt ,


Any thing come of this?
My new system under way now (3 weeks only - 13 selections for 6 wins
but no value.....)

Still lookin , getting closer , but need price.

And you ?
Hi axledog,

I didn't really look any further into this mate, my last start winner systems are all going well so I didn't feel the need to try and scrutinize any further. I hope your S/R continues, if you can get the best price you will be ahead over time.

Cheers,

Matt.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 9th June 2012, 04:01 PM
mattio mattio is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gunny72
The stats show that the average strike rate of horses decreases as number of career starts increases but I am not sure how to interpret this. Should we be giving horses with fewer starts a greater rating or should we be compensating horses that have had a lot of starts?
Interesting point raised here, I have found that most of the systems I use perform best with horses that have won a maximium of 4 races, after this the number of winners and profitability tends to drop away a bit in my experience.

Cheers,

Matt.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:10 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655